Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33950014›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology2021

Challenges in solving structures from radiation-damaged tomograms of protein nanocrystals assessed by simulation.

Ariana Peck, Qing Yao, Aaron S Brewster, Petrus H Zwart, John M Heumann, Nicholas K Sauter, Grant J Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ariana PeckDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-3897
Qing YaoDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3575-9909
Aaron S BrewsterMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0908-7822
Petrus H ZwartMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3315-4092
John M HeumannDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6751-3028
Nicholas K SauterMolecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2786-6552
Grant J JensenDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1556-4864

Funding

Virus TransmissionP50AI150464 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HOPE, THOMAS · 2019 to 2021
$14.9M
DIALS: New Computational Methods to Enable Challenging Crystallographic ExperimentsR01GM117126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI SAUTER, NICHOLAS K · 2016 to 2023
$6.1M
Imaging large macromolecular complexes inside cells with electron cryotomographyR35GM122588 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI JENSEN, GRANT J · 2017 to 2020
$1.9M
Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation DRG 2361-19National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI150464National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences GM117126NIAID NIH HHS P50 AI150464NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117126NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-determination methods are needed to resolve the atomic details that underlie protein function. X-ray crystallography has provided most of our knowledge of protein structure, but is constrained by the need for large, well ordered crystals and the loss of phase information. The rapidly developing methods of serial femtosecond crystallography, micro-electron diffraction and single-particle reconstruction circumvent the first of these limitations by enabling data collection from nanocrystals or purified proteins. However, the first two methods also suffer from the phase problem, while many proteins fall below the molecular-weight threshold required for single-particle reconstruction. Cryo-electron tomography of protein nanocrystals has the potential to overcome these obstacles of mainstream structure-determination methods. Here, a data-processing scheme is presented that combines routines from X-ray crystallography and new algorithms that have been developed to solve structures from tomograms of nanocrystals. This pipeline handles image-processing challenges specific to tomographic sampling of periodic specimens and is validated using simulated crystals. The tolerance of this workflow to the effects of radiation damage is also assessed. The simulations indicate a trade-off between a wider tilt range to facilitate merging data from multiple tomograms and a smaller tilt increment to improve phase accuracy. Since phase errors, but not merging errors, can be overcome with additional data sets, these results recommend distributing the dose over a wide angular range rather than using a finer sampling interval to solve the protein structure.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationCryoelectron MicroscopyCrystallography, X-RayElectron Microscope TomographyImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, MolecularNanoparticlesProteinsProteinscryo-electron tomographydiffraction methodsnanocrystalsradiation damage

Identifiers

PMID33950014
PMCPMC8098477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.