Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949976›Full record

ArticleActa crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications2021

Simplified heavy-atom derivatization of protein structures via co-crystallization with the MAD tetragon tetrabromoterephthalic acid.

Jia Q Truong, Stephanie Nguyen, John B Bruning, Keith E Shearwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jia Q TruongSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7328-189X
Stephanie NguyenInstitute of Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0989-7734
John B BruningInstitute of Photonics and Advanced Sensing (IPAS), School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6919-1824
Keith E ShearwinSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7736-2742

Funding

Australian Research Council DP150103009Australian Research Council DP160101450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The phase problem is a persistent bottleneck that impedes the structure-determination pipeline and must be solved to obtain atomic resolution crystal structures of macromolecules. Although molecular replacement has become the predominant method of solving the phase problem, many scenarios still exist in which experimental phasing is needed. Here, a proof-of-concept study is presented that shows the efficacy of using tetrabromoterephthalic acid (B4C) as an experimental phasing compound. Incorporating B4C into the crystal lattice using co-crystallization, the crystal structure of hen egg-white lysozyme was solved using MAD phasing. The strong anomalous signal generated by its four Br atoms coupled with its compatibility with commonly used crystallization reagents render B4C an effective experimental phasing compound that can be used to overcome the phase problem.

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensCrystallizationCrystallography, X-RayHydrocarbons, BrominatedModels, MolecularMuramidasePhthalic AcidsProtein Conformationhen egg lysozymeHydrocarbons, BrominatedMuramidasePhthalic Acidsterephthalic acidB4Cco-crystallizationcrystallographyexperimental phasinglysozymetetrabromoterephthalic acid

Identifiers

PMID33949976
PMCPMC8098126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.