Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949835›Full record

ArticlePolitics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences2021

Direct democracy, policy diffusion, and medicalized marijuana.

Cynthia Rugeley, John Frendreis, Raymond Tatalovich

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Politics and the life sciences : the journal of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cynthia RugeleyUniversity of Minnesota Duluth, crugeley@d.umn.edu.
John FrendreisLoyola University Chicago.
Raymond TatalovichLoyola University Chicago.
Loyola University Chicago · USUniversity of Minnesota, Duluth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtually all studies of policy diffusion are based on statutory enactments by state legislatures. But a substantial number of medicalized marijuana laws were initiated through citizen initiatives and ratified by referenda (I&R). This case study suggests that the diffusion of laws adopted by I&R requires two modifications to the conventional model of policy diffusion. First, early policy adoptions must occur through direct democracy so that horizontal diffusion results when those past adoptions by the I&R process lead to future adoptions. Second, the necessity of bypassing institutions of representative government must be operationalized as an interaction between the availability of direct democracy and the precise political variable that blocks legislative enactments.

Indexed as

CannabisDemocracyForecastingHumansPolicydirect democracymedicalized marijuanapolicy diffusionreferendum

Identifiers

PMID33949835
OpenAlexW3159120630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.