ArticleNursing open2021
How do nurses and physicians assess inter-professional collaboration in long-term care homes? A survey study.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status of interprofessional competency among healthcare professions in Japan: A cross-sectional web-based survey.Journal of general and family medicine · 2023Article
- Facilitators for developing an interprofessional learning culture in nursing homes: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- [Nursing home-sensitive conditions and approaches to reduce hospitalization of nursing home residents].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2023Article
- Position paper of the GMA Committee Interprofessional Education in the Health Professions - current status and outlook.GMS journal for medical education · 2022Article
- How do nurses and physicians assess inter-professional collaboration in long-term care homes? A survey study.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess inter-professional collaboration between nurses and physicians in long-term care facilities and to determine if there are differences between subgroups of nurses.
designA cross-sectional questionnaire survey was carried out between January 2018 and January 2020.
methods408 health professionals (345 nurses, 63 physicians) from 37 nursing homes in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany) participated in the survey. For data collection, the "Team-Scale" and "Work Situation Questionnaire for nurses/physicians" instruments were used. Furthermore, five self-generated items were employed assessing how ward rounds and documentation are implemented. For the evaluation, descriptive analyses, one-way variance analyses (ANOVAs) and a multilevel analysis were performed.
resultsInter-professional teamwork was rated positively overall. However, the nursing staff usually gave more critical assessments than the physicians (for example, regarding mutual appreciation). Critical assessments could be used to initiate constructive change processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.