ArticleThoracic cancer2021
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the era of intensity modulated radiotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Phase II Study of Prophylactic TPO Combined with Bone Marrow-sparing Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy to Reduce Platelet Inhibition in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
Efficacy and Safety of Concurrent Sintilimab and Radiotherapy With Immunonutrition Support in Esophageal Cancer: A Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of Chinese medicine injection combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of esophageal cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Treatment strategies for elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative evaluation of non-surgical and surgical treatment modalities for oral cancer.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Correlation of nutritional support and immunonutritional indicators with prognosis and survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of concurrent programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor and definitive radiotherapy with immunonutrition support in esophageal squamous cell cancer: a phase II multicenter clinical trial.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Elevated Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio after First Cycle of Chemotherapy and Better Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients Receiving Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the survival benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) during the years of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
methodsMedical records of 1089 patients with ESCC who received IMRT from January 2005 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 617 patients received CCRT, 472 patients received radiotherapy (RT) alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to eliminate baseline differences between the two groups. Survival and toxicity profile were evaluated afterward.
resultsAfter a median follow-up time of 47.9 months (3.2-149.8 months), both overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the CCRT group were better than those of the RT alone group, either before or after PSM. After PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS of RT alone and CCRT groups were 59.0% versus 70.2%, 27.7% versus 40.5% and 20.3% versus 33.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS were 39.4% versus 49.0%, 18.3% versus 30.4% and 10.5% versus 25.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The rates of ≥ grade 3 leukopenia and radiation esophagitis in the CCRT group were higher than that of RT alone group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the probability of radiation pneumonitis between the two groups (p = 0.167). Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that female, EQD2 ≥60 Gy and concurrent chemotherapy were favorable prognostic factors for both OS and PFS.
conclusionsConcurrent chemotherapy can bring survival benefits to patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving IMRT. For patients who cannot tolerate concurrent chemotherapy, RT alone is an effective alternative with promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.