Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949742›Full record

ArticleEuropean eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association2021

The psychometric network structure of mental health in eating disorder patients.

Jan Alexander de Vos, Mirjam Radstaak, Ernst T Bohlmeijer, Gerben J Westerhof

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Study of Eating Disorders from a Network Perspective: A Scoping Systematic Review.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Alexander de VosDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8611-0777
Mirjam RadstaakDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Ernst T BohlmeijerDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gerben J WesterhofDepartment of Psychology, Health and Technology, Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
University of Twente · NLFoundation Centrum '45 · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePsychometric network analysis has led to new possibilities to assess the structure and dynamics of psychiatric disorders. The current study focuses on mental health networks in patients with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder and other specified eating disorders (EDs).

methodNetwork analyses were applied with five mental health domains (emotional, psychological and social well-being, and general and specific psychopathology) among 905 ED patients. Also, networks of 36 underlying symptoms related to the domains were estimated. The network stability, structure and (bridge) centrality of the nodes were assessed for the total group and each ED type. Network differences between the ED types were also examined.

resultsED psychopathology was only weakly connected with the well-being domains. Psychological well-being was the most central node in the domain network. The most central nodes in the symptom network were feeling depressed, feeling worthless, purpose in life and self-acceptance. Bridge symptoms between well-being and psychopathology were self-acceptance, environmental mastery, interested in life and feeling depressed. There were no network differences between the ED types in both the domain and symptom networks.

conclusionsThis study shows novel associations between well-being and psychopathology in ED patients. Central domains and their underlying symptoms may be especially important to consider in treatment for promoting mental health in ED patients.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaBulimia NervosaFeeding and Eating DisordersHumansMental HealthPsychometricseating disordersnetwork analysispositive functioningpositive mental healthpsychological well-beingwell-being

Identifiers

PMID33949742
PMCPMC8252750
OpenAlexW3157173093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.