Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949739›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.

Marie-Pascale Pomey, Nathalie Clavel, Louise Normandin, Claudio Del Grande, Djahanchah Philip Ghadiri, Isabel Fernandez-McAuley, Antoine Boivin, Luigi Flora, Annie Janvier, Philippe Karazivan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Fostering Physician-Patient Partnerships: The Importance of Embracing the Ontological and Epistemological Understandings of Knowledge.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Review
  5. Assessment of Hope in Pediatric Oncology: Development, Content and Face Validation of a Parental Questionnaire.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accompanying patients in clinical oncology teams: Reported activities and perceived effects.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessing and promoting partnership between patients and health-care professionals: Co-construction of the CADICEE tool for patients and their relatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marie-Pascale PomeySchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-8139
Nathalie ClavelIngram School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0438-6655
Louise NormandinCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l', Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8166-8090
Claudio Del GrandeSchool of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6261-791X
Djahanchah Philip GhadiriDepartment of Management, HEC Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-718X
Isabel Fernandez-McAuleyCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l', Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1475-3284
Antoine BoivinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7824-8602
Luigi FloraFaculté de Médecine, Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1519-7793
Annie JanvierDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5462-9352
Philippe KarazivanCentre of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1346-6139
Jean-François PelletierDepartment of Psychiatry and Addictology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-1826
Nicolas FernandezDepartment of Education, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3840-2641
Jesseca PaquetteCentre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l', Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0361-1440
Vincent DumezCentre of Excellence on Partnership with Patients and the Public, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-554X

Funding

CIHR PEG-145218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPartnership between patients and health-care professionals (HCPs) is a concept that needs a valid, practical measure to facilitate its use by patients and HCPs.

objectiveTo co-construct a tool for measuring the degree of partnership between patients and HCPs.

designThe CADICEE tool was developed in four steps: (1) generate key dimensions of patient partnership in clinical care; (2) co-construct the tool; (3) assess face and content validity from patients' and HCPs' viewpoints; and (4) assess the usability of the tool and explore its measurement performance.

resultsThe CADICEE tool comprises 24 items under 7 dimensions: 1) relationship of Confidence or trust between the patient and the HCPs; 2) patient Autonomy; 3) patient participation in Decisions related to care; 4) shared Information on patient health status or care; 5) patient personal Context; 6) Empathy; and 7) recognition of Expertise. Assessment of the tool's usability and measurement performance showed, in a convenience sample of 246 patients and relatives, high face validity, acceptability and relevance for both patients and HCPs, as well as good construct validity.

conclusionsThe CADICEE tool is developed in co-construction with patients to evaluate the degree of partnership in care desired by patients in their relationship with HCPs. The tool can be used in various clinical contexts and in different health-care settings. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients were involved in determining the importance of constructing this questionnaire. They co-constructed it, pre-tested it and were part of the entire questionnaire development process. Three patients participated in the writing of the article.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelPatient ParticipationHumansReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesclinical careco-constructionhealth-care surveyspatient involvementpatient partnershiptool

Identifiers

PMID33949739
PMCPMC8369086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.