ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2021
Characterization of Patients With Obstructed Defecation and Slow Transit Constipation With a Simulated Stool.
Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dyssynergia phenotypes in obstructed defecation: insights from Fecobionics assessment.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2026Observational
- Resting and Squeeze Anal Pull-Through Assessments by Fecobionics Demonstrate Weak Anal Sphincters in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Anorectal manometric data depend on the direction of pressure measurements in healthy individuals and in patients with functional constipation.Annals of coloproctology · 2025Article
- Anorectal Friction Force Is Reduced in Fecal Incontinence.Gastro hep advances · 2025Review
- Integrating technologies for comprehensive anorectal assessment: steps toward objective functional diagnosis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Consistency of Feces Affects Defecatory Function.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2024Article
- The rectum, anal sphincter and puborectalis muscle show different contraction wave forms during prolonged measurement with a simulated feces.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fecobionics in proctology: review and perspectives.Surgery open digestive advance · 2023Article
- Concise Commentary: Testing the Reliability and Accuracy of the Fecobionics Device.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Defecatory Function Studies Using the Fecobionics Device Are Repeatable.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Anorectal volume-pressure relations, contraction work, and flow during defecation.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2022Article
- Fecobionics characterization of female patients with fecal incontinence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Feasibility study of defecation studied with a wireless Fecobionics probe in normal subjects.Physiological reports · 2022Article
- Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDefecatory disorders including obstructed defecation (OD) are currently diagnosed using specialized investigations including anorectal manometry and the balloon expulsion test. Recently, we developed a simulated stool named Fecobionics that provides a novel type of pressure measurements and analysis. The aim was to study OD phenotypes compared with slow transit constipation (STC) patients and normal subjects (NS).
methodsFecobionics expulsion parameters were assessed in an interventional study design. The Fecobionics device contained pressure sensors at the front, rear, and inside a bag. All constipation patients had colon transit study, defecography, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test performed. The Fecobionics bag was distended in the rectum until desire-to-defecate in 26 OD compared with 8 STC patients and 10 NS. Rear-front pressures (preload-afterload parameters) and defecation indices (DIs) were compared between groups.
resultsThe Wexner constipation scoring system score was 13.8 ± 0.9 and 14.6 ± 1.5 in the OD and STC patients (P > 0.5). The median desire-to-defecate volume was 80 (quartiles 56-80), 60 (54-80), and 45 (23-60) mL in OD, STC, and NS, respectively (P < 0.01). The median expulsion duration was 37 (quartiles 15-120), 6 (3-11), and 11 (8-11) seconds for the 3 groups (P < 0.03). Fecobionics rear-front pressure diagrams demonstrated clockwise loops with distinct phenotype differences between OD and the other groups. Most DIs differed between OD and the other groups, especially those based on the anal afterload reflecting the nature of OD constipation. Several OD subtypes were identified. DISCUSSION: Fecobionics obtained novel pressure phenotypes in OD patients. DIs showed pronounced differences between groups. Larger studies are needed on OD subtyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.