Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949248›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Patient Perspectives on Religiously Affiliated Care in Rural and Urban Colorado.

Joseph Robert Fuchs, Jeffrey William Fuchs, Joshua M Hauser, Marilyn E Coors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Religious Hospitals and Poorer Health Outcomes: A Case Study Using Hospital Performance Ratings.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph Robert FuchsUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4399-6496
Jeffrey William FuchsNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joshua M HauserDivision of Palliative Care, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marilyn E CoorsDepartment of Psychiatry & The Center for Bioethics and Humanities, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionReligiously affiliated healthcare organizations play an important role in the delivery of care in the United States. There is a gap in the literature regarding patients' attitudes toward receiving care at these institutions, especially in geographically diverse populations.

methodsIn this two-site pilot study, we conducted a written survey of 141 adult primary care patients at non-religiously affiliated clinics in rural and urban Colorado. Demographic information, measures of religiosity and spirituality, and opinions regarding religiously affiliated care were collected.

results73.3% and 69.6% of patients in rural and urban counties, respectively, had no preference as to the religious affiliation of their care. However, patients in the urban county (24.1%) were more likely than those in the rural county (8.3%) to prefer care that was not affiliated with any religion.

conclusionsThis study suggests that concerns such as proximity to care and patient/provider relationships may be more important to patients than the possible religious affiliation of a healthcare organization. This work is a first step in better understanding patients' attitudes toward religiously affiliated care in urban versus rural settings.

Indexed as

ReligionSpiritualityAdultColoradoHumansPilot ProjectsRural PopulationUnited Statespatient preferencereligionruralspiritualityurban

Identifiers

PMID33949248
PMCPMC8114281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.