Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949209›Full record

ArticleAssessment2022

Psychometric Evaluation of a Big Five Personality State Scale for Intensive Longitudinal Studies.

Whitney R Ringwald, Stephen B Manuck, Anna L Marsland, Aidan G C Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Idiographic momentary profiles of personality facets.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Associations of state and trait empathy with daily alcohol use.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antagonism in Daily Life: An Exploratory Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Whitney R RingwaldUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8883-5963
Stephen B ManuckUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Anna L MarslandUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Aidan G C WrightUniversity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
Biobehavioral mechanisms linking personality to health in midlifeR01AG056043 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MARSLAND, ANNA L · 2016 to 2020
$4.2M
Metabolic and Inflammatory Pathways of Midlife Neurocognitive DisparitiesR01DK110041 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GIANAROS, PETER J, MARSLAND, ANNA L · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIA NIH HHS R01 AG056043NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite enthusiasm for using intensive longitudinal designs to measure day-to-day manifestations of personality underlying differences between people, the validity of personality state scales has yet to be established. In this study, we evaluated the psychometrics of 20-item and 10-item daily, Big Five personality state scales in three independent samples (

Indexed as

PersonalityPersonality DisordersHumansLongitudinal StudiesPersonality InventoryPsychometricsReproducibility of Resultsintensive longitudinal designmultilevel modelingpersonality assessmentpersonality states

Identifiers

PMID33949209
PMCPMC9832333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.