Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33949066›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Talk to us! Communication is a key factor in improving the comfort of MRI research participants.

Rebecca S Dewey, Claire Ward, Andrea Junor, Adele Horobin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ten simple rules for research with humans.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Talk to us! Communication is a key factor in improving the comfort of MRI research participants.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca S DeweySir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6888-3298
Claire WardPatient co-facilitator, Nottingham, UK.
Andrea JunorNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.
Adele HorobinNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt Charles Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an invaluable diagnostic and research tool. Having an MRI scan is not always comfortable and may deter people from taking part in MRI research. Maximizing comfort during scanning will improve participants' experiences and image quality.

objectiveTo define which factors improve comfort during an MRI scan for research by asking people who have participated in MRI research. SETTING AND

participantsPeople who had participated in MRI research during the past two years were invited, as 'public advisors' to discuss their experiences together and agree on which factors are most important in ensuring comfort while participating in MRI research.

resultsPublic advisors ranked researcher-participant communication as the most important factor. In response, an example script to guide MRI researchers in communicating with participants was developed through close consultation between research staff, public advisors and the public. This outlines the often-missing information necessary to convey to participants, including explaining the reasons behind instructions, managing expectations, providing reassurance, encouragement and progress updates during scanning.

conclusionsDrawing upon personal experiences as MRI research participants, public advisors highlighted the importance of effective and on-going researcher communication throughout. The example script may be used as a training tool for researchers to help ensure participants' comfort during scanning. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: All contributors had previously taken part in MRI research. The project was co-designed, co-delivered and co-authored with a public research partner. Public advisors agreed key factors of importance. External public reviewers and public advisors reviewed example script drafts.

Indexed as

CommunicationReferral and ConsultationHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingcommunicationcommunity involvementmagnetic resonance imagingpatient comfortpatient involvement

Identifiers

PMID33949066
PMCPMC8369077
OpenAlexW3157163108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.