Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948898›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2022

NeuroCrypt: Machine Learning Over Encrypted Distributed Neuroimaging Data.

Nipuna Senanayake, Robert Podschwadt, Daniel Takabi, Vince D Calhoun, Sergey M Plis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nipuna SenanayakeGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. ssenanayake1@student.gsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-4461
Robert PodschwadtGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Daniel TakabiGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Vince D CalhounGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sergey M PlisGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

COINSTAC: Decentralized, Scalable Analysis of Loosely Coupled DataR01DA040487 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, PLIS, SERGEY · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
ENIGMA-COINSTAC-APOE2 Functional and structural connectome protective mechanisms for Alzheimer’s disease and mood disorders: Request for supplemental funds for NIH R01:1R01MH121246R01MH121246 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, TURNER, JESS · 2019 to 2023
$5.0M
Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Data-driven solutions for temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal dynamic functional connectivityR01MH123610 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
Nobrainer: A robust and validated neural network tool suite for imagersRF1MH121885 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GHOSH, SATRAJIT SUJIT · 2020 to 2020
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040487NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH121246NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123610NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH121885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of neuroimaging can greatly benefit from building machine learning models to detect and predict diseases, and discover novel biomarkers, but much of the data collected at various organizations and research centers is unable to be shared due to privacy or regulatory concerns (especially for clinical data or rare disorders). In addition, aggregating data across multiple large studies results in a huge amount of duplicated technical debt and the resources required can be challenging or impossible for an individual site to build. Training on the data distributed across organizations can result in models that generalize much better than models trained on data from any of organizations alone. While there are approaches for decentralized sharing, these often do not provide the highest possible guarantees of sample privacy that only cryptography can provide. In addition, such approaches are often focused on probabilistic solutions. In this paper, we propose an approach that leverages the potential of datasets spread among a number of data collecting organizations by performing joint analyses in a secure and deterministic manner when only encrypted data is shared and manipulated. The approach is based on secure multiparty computation which refers to cryptographic protocols that enable distributed computation of a function over distributed inputs without revealing additional information about the inputs. It enables multiple organizations to train machine learning models on their joint data and apply the trained models to encrypted data without revealing their sensitive data to the other parties. In our proposed approach, organizations (or sites) securely collaborate to build a machine learning model as it would have been trained on the aggregated data of all the organizations combined. Importantly, the approach does not require a trusted party (i.e. aggregator), each contributing site plays an equal role in the process, and no site can learn individual data of any other site. We demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed approach, in a range of empirical evaluations using different machine learning algorithms including logistic regression and convolutional neural network models on human structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityMachine LearningAlgorithmsHumansNeuroimagingConvolutional neural networksLogistic regressionMachine learningNeuroimagingPrivacySecure multiparty computation

Identifiers

PMID33948898
PMCPMC8566325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.