ArticleNeuroinformatics2022
NeuroCrypt: Machine Learning Over Encrypted Distributed Neuroimaging Data.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- LSTM guided homomorphic encryption for threat-resistant IoT networks.Discover computing · 2025Article
- Decentralized Mixed Effects Modeling in COINSTAC.Neuroinformatics · 2024Article
- Enhancing collaborative neuroimaging research: introducing COINSTAC Vaults for federated analysis and reproducibility.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Federated Analysis of Neuroimaging Data: A Review of the Field.Neuroinformatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of neuroimaging can greatly benefit from building machine learning models to detect and predict diseases, and discover novel biomarkers, but much of the data collected at various organizations and research centers is unable to be shared due to privacy or regulatory concerns (especially for clinical data or rare disorders). In addition, aggregating data across multiple large studies results in a huge amount of duplicated technical debt and the resources required can be challenging or impossible for an individual site to build. Training on the data distributed across organizations can result in models that generalize much better than models trained on data from any of organizations alone. While there are approaches for decentralized sharing, these often do not provide the highest possible guarantees of sample privacy that only cryptography can provide. In addition, such approaches are often focused on probabilistic solutions. In this paper, we propose an approach that leverages the potential of datasets spread among a number of data collecting organizations by performing joint analyses in a secure and deterministic manner when only encrypted data is shared and manipulated. The approach is based on secure multiparty computation which refers to cryptographic protocols that enable distributed computation of a function over distributed inputs without revealing additional information about the inputs. It enables multiple organizations to train machine learning models on their joint data and apply the trained models to encrypted data without revealing their sensitive data to the other parties. In our proposed approach, organizations (or sites) securely collaborate to build a machine learning model as it would have been trained on the aggregated data of all the organizations combined. Importantly, the approach does not require a trusted party (i.e. aggregator), each contributing site plays an equal role in the process, and no site can learn individual data of any other site. We demonstrate effectiveness of the proposed approach, in a range of empirical evaluations using different machine learning algorithms including logistic regression and convolutional neural network models on human structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.