Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948848›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Bioaccumulation and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in food crops irrigated with freshwater and treated wastewater: a case study in Southern Cairo, Egypt.

Hanan Elsayed Mohamed Osman, Enas Mohamed Wagdi Abdel-Hamed, Widad Saleem Mubarak Al-Juhani, Yaser Ayesh Omer Al-Maroai, Mohamed Helmy El-Metwally El-Morsy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hanan Elsayed Mohamed OsmanBiology Department, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. heosman@uqu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-842X
Enas Mohamed Wagdi Abdel-HamedSoil Science Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-0375
Widad Saleem Mubarak Al-JuhaniBiology Department, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7188-1376
Yaser Ayesh Omer Al-MaroaiBiology Department, Faculty of Applied Science, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-6854
Mohamed Helmy El-Metwally El-MorsyDeanship of Scientific Research, Umm Al-Qura University, Al Mukarramah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5924-9471
Umm al-Qura University · SAZagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food safety has often attracted attention worldwide. Few studies have investigated the heavy metal (HM) pollution and health risk assessment of crops and vegetables. The current work was conducted to evaluate the human risk assessment of HM (Cu, Cd, Cr, Pb, and Zn) in radish, lettuce, tomato, onion, turnip, squash, okra, sunflower, Jews mallow, and garden rocket cultivated in treated wastewater (TWW)-irrigated sites as compared with those cultivated in freshwater (FW)-irrigated sites. Irrigation water, soil, and different plants were collected from 6 farmlands irrigated with TWW and two agricultural sites irrigated with FW (Nile river). Heavy metal transfer factor (HMTF), chronic daily intake of metals (CDIM), health hazard risk (HR), and health hazard index (HI) were estimated. The results showed that the tested HM levels in FW and TWW were below the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and Egyptian standards recommended for irrigation. In soil samples, HM levels were below the permissible limits for both tested sites. The HM in soil and plants grew in TWW-irrigated sites possessed multiple levels higher than those grown in FW-irrigated sites. Among different plants, HM levels in the edible parts of plants grown in TWW-irrigated sites followed in decreasing order: tomato > sunflower >Jew's mallow = turnip = squash > lettuce > okra = radish > onion > garden rocket. The mean CDIM and HR values of plants irrigated using TWW were higher than those irrigated using FW. Furthermore, HR values for all plants grown in polluted and unpolluted sites were < 1 except Cd in plants grown in the TWW-irrigated farmlands. The mean HI for radish, lettuce, tomato, onion, turnip, squash, okra, sunflower, Jews mallow, and garden rocket grown in TWW-irrigated sites were 2.08, 2.39, 1.76, 1.53, 2.08, 1.80, 2.03, 1.91, 1.82, and 1.44 (for adult), and 2.39, 2.75, 2.71, 1.75, 2.38, 2.06, 2.33, 2.69, 2.10, and 1.65 (for children). Plants irrigated with TWW showed a higher HMTF than plants irrigated with FW. Jew's mallow and okra irrigated with TWW had a maximum HMTF. Consequently, different practical measures can be taken to minimize the HM levels in agricultural foodstuffs. These measures include preventing the excessive application of pesticides and fertilizers for crop production and continuous monitoring of different foodstuffs in the market.

Indexed as

Metals, HeavySoil PollutantsAdultBioaccumulationChildEgyptEnvironmental MonitoringFresh WaterHumansRisk AssessmentWastewaterMetals, HeavySoil PollutantsWastewaterChronic daily intake of metalsEdible plantsFreshwaterHeavy metal transfer factorHuman risk assessmentTreated wastewater

Identifiers

PMID33948848
OpenAlexW3157372903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.