Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948811›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma-impregnated polycaprolactone-β tricalcium phosphate bio-scaffold enhanced bone regeneration around dental implants.

Akram Abdo Almansoori, Oh-Jun Kwon, Jeong-Hun Nam, Young-Kwon Seo, Hae-Ryong Song, Jong-Ho Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Peri-implant bone regeneration in pigs.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Construction ofRegenerative biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Scaffolds for Dentin-Pulp Complex Regeneration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akram Abdo AlmansooriDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Oh-Jun KwonDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Jeong-Hun NamDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Young-Kwon SeoDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Dongkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
Hae-Ryong SongDepartment of Orthopedics and Dwarfism Clinic, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jong-Ho LeeDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. leejongh@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRMcGill University · CASeoul National University Dental Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFinding a material that supports bone regeneration is the concern for many investigators. We supposed that a composite scaffold of poly(ε) caprolactone and β-tricalcium phosphate (PCL-TCP) would entail desirable characteristics of biocompatibility, bioresorbability, rigidity, and osteoconductivity for a proper guided bone regeneration. Furthermore, the incorporation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) would boost the bone regeneration. We conducted this study to evaluate the bone regeneration capacity of PCL-TCP scaffold that is loaded with MSCs and PRP. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive miniature pigs received 6 implants in 6 created-mandibular bony defects in the right and left lower premolar areas. The bony defects were managed according to the following three groups: the PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with MSCs and PRP (MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP) group (n = 10), PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with PRP (PRP+PCL-TCP) group (n = 10), and PCL-TCP scaffold group (n = 10). After 12 weeks, the bone regeneration was assessed using fluorochrome bone labeling, μCT bone morphogenic analysis, and histomorphometric analysis.

resultsAll of the three groups supported the bone regeneration around the dental implants. However, the PCL-TCP scaffold loaded with MSCs and PRP (MSCs+PRP+PCL-TCP) group showed non-significant higher bone surface, bone specific surface, and bone surface density than the other two groups as revealed by the μCT bone morphogenic analysis. Histologically, the same group revealed higher bone-implant contact ratio (BIC) (p = 0.017) and new bone height formation (NBH, mm) (p = 0.0097) with statistically significant difference compared to the PCL-TCP scaffold group.

conclusionsPCL-TCP scaffold is compatible for bone regeneration in bone defects surrounding dental implants. Moreover, the incorporation of MSCs and PRP optimized the bone regeneration process with respect to the rate of scaffold replacement, the height of the regenerated bone, and implant stability.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsMesenchymal Stem CellsPlatelet-Rich PlasmaAnimalsBone RegenerationCalcium PhosphatesPolyestersSwinebeta-tricalcium phosphateCalcium PhosphatesDental ImplantspolycaprolactonePolyesterstricalcium phosphateDental implantsGuided bone regenerationMesenchymal stem cellsPlatelet-rich plasmaPolycaprolactoneβ-Tricalcium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID33948811
PMCPMC8096877
OpenAlexW3158423999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.