Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948802›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2021

The Role of Gender in Careers in Medicine: a Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Literature.

Abigail Ford Winkel, Beatrice Telzak, Jacquelyn Shaw, Calder Hollond, Juliana Magro, Joseph Nicholson, Gwendolyn Quinn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Why Are There So Few Women Medical School Deans? Debunking the Myth That Shorter Tenures Drive Disparities.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abigail Ford WinkelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. abigail.winkel@nyumc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6149-5842
Beatrice TelzakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Jacquelyn ShawDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Calder HollondPomona College, Claremont, CA, USA.
Juliana MagroHealth Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph NicholsonHealth Sciences Library, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Gwendolyn QuinnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Innovations in Medical Education, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender disparities exist in the careers of women in medicine. This review explores the qualitative literature to understand how gender influences professional trajectories, and identify opportunities for intervention.

methodsA systematic review and thematic synthesis included articles obtained from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), APA PsycInfo (Ovid), and GenderWatch (ProQuest) on June 26 2020, updated on September 10, 2020. Included studies explored specialty choice, leadership roles, practice setting, burnout, promotion, stigma, mentoring, and organizational culture. Studies taking place outside of the USA, using only quantitative data, conducted prior to 2000, or focused on other health professions were excluded. Data were extracted using a standardized extraction tool and assessed for rigor and quality using a 9-item appraisal tool. A three-step process for thematic synthesis was used to generate analytic themes and construct a conceptual model. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020199999).

findingsAmong 1524 studies identified, 64 were eligible for analysis. Five themes contributed to a conceptual model for the influence of gender on women's careers in medicine that resembles a developmental socio-ecological model. Gender influences career development externally through culture which valorizes masculine stereotypes and internally shapes women's integration of personal and professional values.

conclusionMedical culture and structures are implicitly biased against women. Equitable environments in education, mentoring, hiring, promotion, compensation, and support for work-life integration are needed to address gender disparities in medicine. Explicit efforts to create inclusive institutional cultures and policies are essential to support a diverse workforce.

Indexed as

MedicineMentoringFemaleHumansLeadershipMentorsOrganizational Culturecareers in medicinegenderphysician careers

Identifiers

PMID33948802
PMCPMC8342686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.