ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2021
Novel Longitudinal Methods for Assessing Retention in Care: a Synthetic Review.
Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retention in care: is it still a clinically useful indicator for monitoring long-term engagement in HIV care in the treat-all era?AIDS (London, England) · 2026Article
- A Multistate Analysis of Longitudinal Care Outcomes Among People Newly Linked to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care in Missouri.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Progress of HIV care cascade and transition dynamics along the continuum of care among persons living with HIV in Ifakara, Tanzania: a prospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- PrEParing for Long-acting Technologies: A Multistate Analysis of PrEP Persistence and HIV and STI Lab Coverage Among Oral PrEP Initiators in St. Louis, Missouri (2014-2021).Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Latent Variable Statistical Methods for Longitudinal Studies of Multi-Dimensional Health and Education Data: A Scoping Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Review
- Trajectories and predictors of HIV care retention among individuals receiving ART in rural South Africa: a group-based trajectory modelling analysis.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Transitions through the HIV continuum of care in people enrolling in care with advanced HIV disease in Latin America.IJID regions · 2025Article
- Depression and the revolving door of HIV care: using multistate approaches to understand complex longitudinal exposure/outcome relationships among a cohort of people entering HIV care in Cameroon from 2019 to 2020.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Frequent Disengagement and Subsequent Mortality Among People With HIV and Hepatitis C in Canada: A Prospective Cohort Study.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Statistical methods applied for the assessment of the HIV cascade and continuum of care: a systematic scoping review.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Cross-sectional study to assess depression among healthcare workers in Lusaka, Zambia during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Historical visit attendance as predictor of treatment interruption in South African HIV patients: Extension of a validated machine learning model.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewRetention in care is both dynamic and longitudinal in nature, but current approaches to retention often reduce these complex histories into cross-sectional metrics that obscure the nuanced experiences of patients receiving HIV care. In this review, we discuss contemporary approaches to assessing retention in care that captures its dynamic nature and the methodological and data considerations to do so. RECENT
findingsEnhancing retention measurements either through patient tracing or "big data" approaches (including probabilistic matching) to link databases from different sources can be used to assess longitudinal retention from the perspective of the patient when they transition in and out of care and access care at different facilities. Novel longitudinal analytic approaches such as multi-state and group-based trajectory analyses are designed specifically for assessing metrics that can change over time such as retention in care. Multi-state analyses capture the transitions individuals make in between different retention states over time and provide a comprehensive depiction of longitudinal population-level outcomes. Group-based trajectory analyses can identify patient subgroups that follow distinctive retention trajectories over time and highlight the heterogeneity of retention patterns across the population. Emerging approaches to longitudinally measure retention in care provide nuanced assessments that reveal unique insights into different care gaps at different time points over an individuals' treatment. These methods help meet the needs of the current scientific agenda for retention and reveal important opportunities for developing more tailored interventions that target the varied care challenges patients may face over the course of lifelong treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33948789What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.