ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2021
Visualization of small visceral arteries on abdominal CT angiography using ultra-high-resolution CT scanner.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improved delineation of the cystic artery using super-resolution deep learning reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction improves the depiction of peripancreatic arteries and image quality in pancreatic cancer CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Influence of deep learning-based super-resolution reconstruction on Agatston score.European radiology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic utility of chest wall vessel involvement sign on ultra-high-resolution CT for primary lung cancer infiltrating the chest wall.European radiology · 2025Article
- Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- High-resolution computed tomography with 1,024-matrix for artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Cervical CT Angiography: The Advantage of Ultra-High-Resolution CT Versus Conventional HRCT.Cancers · 2024Article
- Investigation of abdominal artery delineation by photon-counting detector CT.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- Improvement of Neurovascular Imaging Using Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography Angiography.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A Feasibility Study to Evaluate Replacing Conventional Computed Tomography at 120 KVP with Low Radiation Dose and Low Iodine Intake Based on Body Mass Index-Adapted Abdominal Computed Tomography Angiography in 291 Patients.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
- Ultra-High-Resolution CT of the Head and Neck with Deep Learning Reconstruction-Assessment of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure and Intraindividual Comparison with Normal-Resolution CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The effectiveness of post-processing head and neck CT angiography using contrast enhancement boost technique.PloS one · 2023Article
- Feasibility of Ultra-High Resolution Supra-Aortic CT Angiography: An Assessment of Diagnostic Image Quality and Radiation Dose.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the image quality and ability to delineate the small visceral arteries of high-resolution (HR) abdominal CT angiography (CTA) using an ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (UHR CT) scanner. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-seven patients were enrolled who underwent abdominal CTA using a UHR CT scanner. The images were reconstructed with a matrix of 1024 × 1024 and 0.25 mm thickness for HR CTA and with a matrix of 512 × 512 and 0.5 mm thickness for normal resolution (NR) CTA. Maximum CT value, image quality, and delineation of the small arteries were compared between HR CTA and NR CTA.
resultsHR CTA showed significantly higher maximum CT value, higher image quality, and better delineation of the small arteries than did NR CTA (P < .005).
conclusionHR CTA using a UHR CT scanner showed higher image quality than NR CTA and enhanced the delineation of visceral arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.