ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2021
Economics of Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies in the USA.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDA's Approval Summary of the First Biosimilar to Natalizumab for the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's Disease.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Economic value of anti-CD20 therapies in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
- Direct Medical Costs Associated with Multiple Sclerosis in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Single-Center Cost of Illness Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Medicare Part D Use and Costs for Immune-Mediated Neurologic Therapies.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Financial Assistance Value for Equitable Access to Specialty Medications for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis Using Health System Pharmacy Services.International journal of MS care · 2025Article
- A narrative review on the safety of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: focus on Europe.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2025Review
- Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Participant Perspectives on Community Qigong for People with Multiple Sclerosis.Integrative medicine reports · 2023Article
- MS care: integrating advanced therapies and holistic management.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Societal economic burden of multiple sclerosis and cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
- The Impact of Insurance Restrictions in Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of MS careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewMultiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent and debilitating neuroinflammatory disease associated with a significant economic burden. Direct healthcare costs, which can average $70,000 a year, have risen rapidly over the last decade and are driven by the escalating cost of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Despite a growing number of DMTs, annual increases in price for most DMTs have commonly exceeded 10% over the last 15 years. The high cost of MS DMTs has created economic hardships for patients in terms of high out-of-pocket costs and insurance company-induced barriers. Although generic versions of glatiramer acetate and dimethyl fumarate have provided some lower cost options, the median annual price for branded products currently exceeds $90,000. The goal of this paper is to examine the economic landscape of MS DMTs in the USA. RECENT
findingsRecent economic analyses have provided new insights into the relative value of DMTs. Robust economic modeling studies suggest that costs per quality-adjusted life-year for most DMTs exceed commonly endorsed thresholds for what is considered a reasonable value in the USA. Because of higher efficacy and lower net costs, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab are considered the best value. It is likely that generic versions of dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate are also economically attractive. DMTs provide clinical benefit for patients with MS; however, their high cost can be a financial burden and impede access. High DMT prices are the principal reason why cost-effectiveness studies have indicated the economic value of most DMTs is questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33948740What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.