SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2021
Pain relief in chronic pancreatitis: endoscopic or surgical treatment? a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopy versus early surgery for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of the long-term outcomes following surgery or endoscopic therapy for chronic pancreatitis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Mechanism-Based Management of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis: An Integrated Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Pancreatitis after Frey's Procedure at Tertiary Care Centre: An Observational Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025Observational
- Role of fully covered metal stents in the management of chronic pancreatitis.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Best Practices for Chronic Pancreatitis Pain Management: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
- Pain in chronic pancreatitis: What can we do today?World journal of methodology · 2024Review
- Quality of life after endoscopic procedures for chronic pancreatitis: A multicentre study.United European gastroenterology journal · 2023Article
- Soft self-expandable metal stent to treat painful pancreatic duct strictures secondary to chronic pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter trial.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Article
- Structural imaging findings are related to clinical complications in chronic pancreatitis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Article
- Surgery for chronic pancreatitis in Finland is rare but seems to produce good long-term results.World journal of clinical cases · 2021Article
- Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic duct stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis: Are we underutilizing a new technology?Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsPain is one of the consequences of chronic pancreatitis (CP) that has the greatest impact on the quality of life of patients. Endoscopic and surgical interventions, by producing a decrease in intraductal pancreatic pressure, can provide pain relief. This is the first systematic review that includes only randomized clinical trials (RTCs) comparing outcomes in the short-term (less than 2 years) and long-term (more than 2 years) between these two types of interventions. MATERIAL AND
methodsA comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases to identify RTCs comparing short and long-term pain relief, procedural complications, and days of hospitalization between endoscopic and surgical interventions was performed following the PRISMA guidelines.
resultsThree RCTs evaluating a total of 199 patients (99 in the endoscopy group and 100 in the surgery group) were included in this study. Surgical interventions provided complete pain relief, with statistical difference, in the long-term (16,4% vs 35.7%; RD 0.19; 95% CI 0.03-0.35; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), without significant difference in short-term (17.5% vs 31.2%; RD 0.14; 95% CI -0.01-0.28; p = 0.07; I2 = 0%) when compared to endoscopy. There was no statistical difference in short-term (17.5% vs 28.1%; RD 0.11; 95% CI -0.04-0.25; p = 0.15; I2 = 0%) and long-term (34% vs 41.1%; RD 0.07; 95% CI -0.10-0.24; p = 0.42; I2 0%) in partial relief of pain between both interventions. In the short-term, both complications (34.9% vs 29.7%; RD 0.05; 95% CI -0.10-0.21; p = 0.50; I2 = 48%) and days of hospitalization (MD -1.02; 95% CI -2.61-0.58; p = 0.21; I2 = 0%) showed no significant differences.
conclusionSurgical interventions showed superior results when compared to endoscopy in terms of complete long-term pain relief. The number of complications and length of hospitalization in both groups were similar.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.