ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2021
Impact of Cholestasis on the Sensitivity of Percutaneous Transluminal Forceps Biopsy in 93 Patients with Suspected Malignant Biliary Stricture.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous Endobiliary Cryobiopsy in Biliary Obstruction: Randomised Study (BICRYOB).Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Trial
- False-negative factors of percutaneous transluminal clamp biopsy for suspected malignant biliary stricture: 194 cases analyzed from a single center.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Percutaneous transhepatic intraluminal forceps biopsy for patients with biliary stricture after endoscopic retrograde approach failure: a retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine the effect of hyperbilirubinemia in the sensitivity of percutaneous transluminal forceps biopsy (PTFB) in patients with suspected malignant biliary stricture. MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety-three patients with suspicion of malignant biliary stricture underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography followed by PTFB. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were analysed based on the presence or absence of hyperbilirubinemia, defined as total bilirubin equal to, or higher than 5 mg/dL. Variables included demographic and clinical features, laboratory, tumour type and localization, stricture length, therapeutic approach and histopathology. Additionally, major morbidity and mortality were assessed.
resultsThe overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of PTFB were 61.1%, 100%, 100%, and 62.4%, respectively. Hyperbilirubinemia affected 57% of patients at the time of PTFB. There were 35 (37%) false negative results, none of them related to tumour type or localization, stricture length, or previous biliary intervention (i.e. PBBD (percutaneous biliary balloon dilatation), ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography)) (p > 0.05). However, when bilirubin was < 5 mg/dL, false negative results decreased globally (p = 0.024) and sensitivity increased significantly for intrahepatic and hilar localization, as well as for colorectal metastasis, gallbladder carcinoma, and pancreatic carcinoma. No major morbidity occurred.
conclusionThe sensitivity of percutaneous transluminal biopsy for diagnosis of malignant stricture may significantly increase if samples are obtained in the absence of hyperbilirubinemia, without adding morbidity to the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Case- Control studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.