Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948648›Full record

ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2021

Size matters in atrial fibrillation: the underestimated importance of reduction of contiguous electrical mass underlying the effectiveness of catheter ablation.

Adam Hartley, Joseph Shalhoub, Fu Siong Ng, Andrew D Krahn, Zachary Laksman, Jason G Andrade, Marc W Deyell, Prapa Kanagaratnam, Markus B Sikkel

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial Autocorrelation Dimension (Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Insertable cardiac monitoring results in higher rates of atrial fibrillation diagnosis and oral anticoagulation prescription after ischaemic stroke.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam HartleyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-2200
Joseph ShalhoubNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1011-7440
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Andrew D KrahnDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 740 Hillside Ave, Vancouver, BC V8T 1Z4, Canada.
Zachary LaksmanDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 740 Hillside Ave, Vancouver, BC V8T 1Z4, Canada.
Jason G AndradeDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 740 Hillside Ave, Vancouver, BC V8T 1Z4, Canada.
Marc W DeyellDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 740 Hillside Ave, Vancouver, BC V8T 1Z4, Canada.
Prapa KanagaratnamNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3593-2185
Markus B SikkelDivision of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, 740 Hillside Ave, Vancouver, BC V8T 1Z4, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAImperial College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/16/3/32175Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 220572/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence has accumulated over the last century of the importance of a critical electrical mass in sustaining atrial fibrillation (AF). AF ablation certainly reduces electrically contiguous atrial mass, but this is not widely accepted to be an important part of its mechanism of action. In this article, we review data showing that atrial size is correlated in many settings with AF propensity. Larger mammals are more likely to exhibit AF. This is seen both in the natural world and in animal models, where it is much easier to create a goat model than a mouse model of AF, for example. This also extends to humans-athletes, taller people, and obese individuals all have large atria and are more likely to exhibit AF. Within an individual, risk factors such as hypertension, valvular disease and ischaemia can enlarge the atrium and increase the risk of AF. With respect to AF ablation, we explore how variations in ablation strategy and the relative effectiveness of these strategies may suggest that a reduction in electrical atrial mass is an important mechanism of action. We counter this with examples in which there is no doubt that mass reduction is less important than competing theories such as ganglionated plexus ablation. We conclude that, when considering future strategies for the ablative therapy of AF, it is important not to discount the possibility that contiguous electrical mass reduction is the most important mechanism despite the disappointing consequence being that enhancing success rates in AF ablation may involve greater tissue destruction.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationAnimalsHeart AtriaHumansMammalsMiceTreatment OutcomeAtrial fibrillationAtrial sizeCatheter ablationCritical mass

Identifiers

PMID33948648
PMCPMC8576280
OpenAlexW3159820920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.