ArticleHeliyon2021
PLEX: the best first-line treatment in nmosd attacks experience at a single center in Colombia.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- Visual Function Improvement after Plasma Exchange Therapy for Acute Optic Neuritis in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: Case Series and Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Treatment for Demyelinating Optic Neuritis Associated with Various Serum Antibodies: A Prospective Cohort Study.Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Assessing attacks and treatment response rates among adult patients with NMOSD and MOGAD: Data from a nationwide registry in Argentina.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePrimary outcome was to evaluate complete improvement at six months after acute treatment in NMOSD relapses.
methodsRetrospective observational cohort study of patients with diagnosis of NMOSD admitted for acute attacks. We performed an explanatory analysis using the univariate, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression approach. We compared survival curves using the Kaplan Meier analysis and estimated the median time for the main outcome.
resultsIn the univariate analysis, basal EDSS score, AQP4-IgG positivity, PLEX as a first-line treatment (IVMP + PLEX), less systemic complications related to acute treatment and total attack history were independently associated with complete improvement at six months. After adjusting for confounding variables and using multivariate analysis by Cox Regression, positive AQ4-IgG (HR 0.04, 95% CI: 0.02-0.66) and IVMP + PLEX (HR 5.1, 95% CI: 3.9-66.4), were kept as independent factors associated to time to complete improvement. Time from admission to PLEX initiation and complete improvement at six months had a median of seven days (95% CI: 5.2-8.8). In secondary effects, there were no statistical differences between the groups.
conclusionsPLEX + IVMP is the treatment of choice for NMOSD relapses and should be initiated as early as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.