Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948486›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021

Identifying and Analyzing Systems Failures: An Interactive, Experiential Learning Approach to Quality Improvement for Clerkship-Level Medical Students.

Galina Gheihman, Brent P Forester, Niraj Sharma, Cynthia So-Armah, Kathleen A Wittels, Tracey A Milligan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Galina GheihmanResident Physician, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-1599-3271
Brent P ForesterChief, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, McLean Hospital; Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School.
Niraj SharmaDirector of the Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Residency Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston Children's Hospital; Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School.
Cynthia So-ArmahAssistant Program Director of Quality Improvement, Internal Medicine Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Kathleen A WittelsDirector of Student Programs, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School.
Tracey A MilliganVice-Chair for Education, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Assistant Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Medical students are positioned to observe, document, and explore opportunities to improve patient safety and quality in their institutions. Medical schools are introducing quality improvement (QI) knowledge and skills in the preclinical classrooms, yet few provide opportunities to apply these tools in the clinical setting. Methods: Clerkship students participated in two 1-hour sessions, organized in groups of 12-15 students, led by faculty with QI expertise. The sessions in the module introduced core concepts in QI and patient safety, while drawing on students' own clinical experiences. Students identified a system failure they encountered in their own clinical setting/practice and analyzed contributing factors using the 5 Whys Tool. We evaluated the efficacy of the two-session module with a pre- and postsurvey of students' self-reported change in knowledge, skills, and attitudes. Surveys also assessed students' satisfaction with module content and format. Faculty perspectives were solicited by email. Results: In April-May 2019, 59 students at a large US medical school participated. Of students, 73% and 53% completed pre- and postsurveys, respectively. All students submitted a report of an identified systems failure and their analysis of contributing factors. Students' self-rated knowledge and skills increased significantly. Students preferred active engagement compared to passive learning. Students and faculty identified areas for future module improvement. Discussion: The educational program was well received and increased students' knowledge and confidence in core concepts of QI and safety. The module addressed the requirement for graduating students to identify safety incidents and contribute to a culture of QI.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansProblem-Based LearningQuality ImprovementExperiential LearningPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementSystems-Based Practice

Identifiers

PMID33948486
PMCPMC8084998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.