Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948385›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021

Contemporary external beam radiotherapy boost or high dose-rate brachytherapy boost for cervical cancer: a propensity-score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study.

Jiaqiang Zhang, Mingyang Sun, Ningtao Li, Mengrong Miao, Yitian Yang, Han-Chuan Hsu, Ho-Min Chen, Szu-Yuan Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiaqiang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Mingyang SunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ningtao LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Mengrong MiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yitian YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Han-Chuan HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital Yilan, Taiwan.
Ho-Min ChenDepartment of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University Taichung, Taiwan.
Szu-Yuan WuDepartment of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University Taichung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To estimate the survival effects of contemporary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) boost modalities (intensity-modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy) and high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost in patients with cervical cancer (CC). Patients who had been diagnosed as having CC were recruited from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. Propensity score matching was performed, and Cox proportional-hazards model curves were used to analyze the all-cause mortality of patients who received standard whole-pelvis irradiation with different boost modalities. The matching process yielded a final cohort of 1,630 patients (815 in the EBRT boost and HDR-BT boost groups, respectively) eligible for further analysis. The multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that the adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence intervals) for EBRT boost compared with HDR-BT boost was 1.62 (1.43-1.84). Multivariable analysis revealed that the independent poor prognostic factors of all-cause mortality among patients with CC were adenocarcinoma, no chemotherapy, Charlson comorbidity index score ≥ 1, age ≥ 60 years, and advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage. HDR-BT boost may be more beneficial than contemporary EBRT boost in selected patients with CC.

Indexed as

boostbrachytherapyCervical cancerexternal beam radiotherapyhigh dose rate

Identifiers

PMID33948385
PMCPMC8085872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.