Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948381›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021

Quantitative evaluation and comparison of two prodrug-activating suicide gene therapies on oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Naining Xu, Honglei Tian, Chun Po Fung, Yuntao Lin, Guang Zhu, Yuehong Shen, Hongyu Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naining XuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen, China.
Honglei TianDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.
Chun Po FungDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.
Yuntao LinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen, China.
Guang ZhuDivision of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.
Yuehong ShenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen, China.
Hongyu YangDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Stomatological Center, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen Peking University-The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Medical Center Shenzhen, China.
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prodrug-activating suicide gene therapy (PA suicide gene therapy for short) for cancer is to introduce cancer cells with suicide genes. The enzyme encoded by suicide gene is not toxic but is able to kill cancer cells by converting a non-toxic prodrug into a toxic compound. This approach is a promising cancer gene therapy that could reduce non-specific toxicity to normal tissue. However, there is no quantitative method to evaluate efficacy of suicide gene therapy in preclinical study. The aim of this study is to develop a new method to quantitatively evaluate and compare prodrug-activating suicide gene therapies. This study was carried out on an oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell line CAL-27. Suicide genes were integrated into

Indexed as

bystander effectCD/5-FCHSV-TK/GCVOSCCSuicide gene therapy

Identifiers

PMID33948381
PMCPMC8085848
OpenAlexW3157466750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.