Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948361›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021

Establishment and verification of prognostic model for gastric cancer based on autophagy-related genes.

Liqiao Chen, Gang Ma, Pengliang Wang, Yinping Dong, Yong Liu, Zhenzhen Zhao, Jiamei Guo, Han Liang, Liyuan Yang, Jingyu Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liqiao ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Gang MaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Pengliang WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Yinping DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Yong LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Zhenzhen ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Jiamei GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Han LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.
Liyuan YangNo. 966 Hospital of PLA Dandong 118000, Liaoning, P. R. China.
Jingyu DengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer Tianjin 300060, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy played a significant role in the development of cancer. In this study, we explored the value of autophagy-associated genes in gastric cancer. RNA sequencing and clinical information containing 375 gastric cancer and 32 normal tissues were gathered from the TCGA portal. Then we stochastically allocated the autophagy-associated genes (AAGs) to training and testing groups. Next, we screened the discrepantly expressed AAGs and the prognostic AAGs by Cox regression analysis and Lasso regression analysis. Afterwards, we structured the model by using the prognostic AAGs and plotted Kaplan-Meier (KM) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to verify the performance of models in both groups. Besides, we utilized Gene Ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses to explore the molecular mechanisms of AAGs in gastric cancer. Finally, we demonstrated discrepant expression of AAGs within gastric cancer and non-tumor tissues at protein level with immunohistochemistry. 28 discrepantly expressed AAGs were screened from the TCGA database which contained 375 gastric cancer and 32 non-tumor samples. Cox and Lasso regression analyses were performed in training group and then we got 5 prognostic AAGs to establish the prognostic model. The patients who had high risk possessed worse overall survival (OS) both in training group (5-year OS, 47.6% vs 23.1%; P < 0.0001) and test group (5-year OS, 49.2% vs 0%, P=0.019). The proportion under ROC curves (AUC) were significant both in training group and test group (5-year AUC, 0.736 vs 0.809). Through this study, we constructed a model for gastric cancer patients which may provide individual treatment and superior prognosis.

Indexed as

autophagy-associated genesGastric cancerprognosissurvival

Identifiers

PMID33948361
PMCPMC8085875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.