Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948312›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2021

Spontaneous regression of herniated cervical disc: A case report and literature review.

Anil Kumar Sharma, Charandeep Singh Gandhoke, Simran Kaur Syal

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anil Kumar SharmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Charandeep Singh GandhokeDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Simran Kaur SyalDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · INBai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe have reviewed 75 cases plus our own single instance of spontaneous regression of herniated cervical discs.

methodsWe searched PubMed and EMBASE databases (until September 2020) utilizing the following keywords; "spontaneous regression," "herniated cervical disc," and "Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) studies."

resultsIn the literature, we found 75 cases of herniated cervical discs which spontaneously regressed; to this, we added our case. Patients averaged 40.95 years of age. Discs were paracentral or foraminal in 84% of the cases, with most occurring at the C5-C6 (51%) and C6-C7 (36%) levels. Symptoms included neck pain/radiculopathy (91%) or myelopathy (9%). The average interval between initial presentation and spontaneous regression of herniated discs on MRI was 9.15 months. Interestingly, on MRI, extruded/sequestrated discs were more likely to undergo spontaneous regression versus protruding discs.

conclusionSuccessive MRI studies documented the spontaneous regression of herniated cervical discs over an average of 9.15 months. Although this may prompt greater consideration for conservative treatment in younger patients without neurologic deficits, those with deficits should be considered for surgery.

Indexed as

ExtrudedForaminalHerniated cervical discParacentralSpontaneous regression

Identifiers

PMID33948312
PMCPMC8088536
OpenAlexW3155515734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.