Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948229›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2020

CTSA recruitment resources: An inventory of what CTSA hubs are currently offering.

Nyiramugisha Niyibizi, Scott McIntosh, Brenda Lee Hudson, Ashley Sipocz, Emily Paku, Carrie Dykes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Selecting EHR-driven recruitment strategies: An evidence-based decision guide.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Public attitudes toward an authorization for contact program for clinical research.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nyiramugisha NiyibiziGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science Alliance, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Scott McIntoshSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Brenda Lee HudsonIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Ashley SipoczClinical and Translational Sciences (NUCATS) Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Emily PakuMedStar Health Research Institute, Georgetown and Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Washington, DC, USA.
Carrie DykesUniversity of Rochester, Clinical and Translation Science Institute, Rochester, NY, USA.
University of Rochester · USEmory University · USIndiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute · USMedStar Health · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn order to tackle the challenge of efficiently meeting clinical research accrual goals, many Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) recipients have developed recruitment support mechanisms and resources to help investigators successfully recruit study participants. Disseminating recruitment best practices and developing collaborations between institutions can help strengthen recruitment capabilities and methodologies currently utilized by researchers.

methodsTo discover what recruitment resources and mechanisms CTSAs are using, the CTSA Recruitment and Retention working group developed an electronic survey, which was distributed to CTSAs between May and July 2019. The survey contained over 50 multiple choice and short answer questions, with 40 of the 64 CTSA institutions completing the survey. Institutions reported on registries, feasibility assessment tools, clinical trial listings, experience recruiting special populations, program operations and evaluation, workforce education, social media use, and other recruitment resources.

resultsAll respondents currently utilize some form of a volunteer registry; over 80% of the CTSAs provide investigators with recruitment consultations, feasibility assessments, study listings, and electronic health record (EHR) utilization; 73% assist with study materials; 47% offer social media assistance. Many institutions reported success in recruiting patients and healthy volunteers, but difficulty in recruiting special populations such as non-English-speaking persons and rural populations. Additional recruitment tools included use of the EHR to facilitate recruitment, use of registries, and use of social media to engage participants.

conclusionsAreas of opportunity or growth include the development of innovative solutions in the areas of social media advertising, identification of participants from special populations, and research volunteer engagement.

Indexed as

collaborationparticipantRecruitmentregistryretentionsurveytraining

Identifiers

PMID33948229
PMCPMC8057486
OpenAlexW3025420882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.