Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948227›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2020

Development and implementation of a community-based research network.

Brittany C Minor, Jessica Dashner, Sandra M Espín Tello, Rebecca Bollinger, Marian Keglovits, James Stowe, Margaret Campbell, Susan L Stark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Planting the Seeds for Building Research Capacity in Communities: Experiences of a Community-Based Research Network.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany C MinorProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jessica DashnerProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sandra M Espín TelloDepartment of Informatics, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-3104
Rebecca BollingerProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Marian KeglovitsProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
James StoweMid-America Regional Council, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Margaret CampbellCampbell & Associates Consulting, Grapeview, WA, USA.
Susan L StarkProgram in Occupational Therapy, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople aging with long-term physical disabilities (PAwLTPD), meaning individuals with onset of disability from birth through midlife, often require long-term support services (LTSS) to remain independence. The LTSS system is fragmented into aging and disability organizations with little communication between them. In addition, there are currently no evidence-based LTSS-type programs listed on the Administration for Community Living website that have been demonstrated to be effective for PAwLTPD. Because of these gaps, we have developed a community-based research network (CBRN), drawing on the practice-based research network model (PBRN), to bring together aging and disability organizations to address the lack of evidence-based programs for PAwLTPD. MATERIALS AND

methodsCommunity-based organizations serving PAwLTPD across the state of Missouri were recruited to join the CBRN. A formative process evaluation of the network was conducted after a year to evaluate the effectiveness of the network.

resultsNine community-based organizations across the state of Missouri joined the CBRN. CBRN members include three centers for independent living (CILs), three area agencies on aging (AAAs), one CIL/AAA hybrid, one non-CIL disability organization, and one non-AAA aging organization. To date, we have held seven meetings, provided educational opportunities for CBRN members, and launched an inaugural research study within the CBRN. Formative evaluation data indicate that CBRN members feel that participation in the CBRN is beneficial.

conclusionThe PBRN model appears to be a feasible framework for use with community-based organizations to facilitate communication between agencies and to support research aimed at addressing the needs of PAwLTPD.

Indexed as

agingcommunity-basedCommunity partnershipsdisabilityPBRN

Identifiers

PMID33948227
PMCPMC8057405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.