Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948205›Full record

ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2020

Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate compared with microfracture for arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and chondral lesions of the hip: bridging the osteoarthritis gap and facilitating enhanced recovery.

Anshul S Sobti, Kwaku W Baryeh, Rex Woolf, Rishi Chana

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Hip arthroscopy in osteoarthritis: Is it an option?Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Missing body language.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anshul S SobtiFRCS (Tr & Orth), Rowley Bristow Unit, Ashford and St. Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford Road, Lyne, Chertsey KT16 0PZ, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-8891
Kwaku W BaryehMRCSEd, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Dorking Road, Epsom KT18 7EG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2807-1965
Rex WoolfFRCA, Princess Margaret Hospital, Osborne Road, Windsor SL4 3SJ, UK.
Rishi ChanaFRCS (Tr & Orth), Princess Margaret Hospital, Osborne Road, Windsor SL4 3SJ, UK.
BMI The Princess Margaret Hospital · GBAshford and St Peter's Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBEpsom Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an attempt to bridge the osteoarthritis (OA) gap, this study compared biological reconstruction with traditional microfracture (MF) techniques in patients with femoroacetabular impingement and focal cartilage defects. Cohorts of two groups were investigated; age, gender and Tonnis grade matched comparison for outcomes between MF and newer biological reconstruction techniques hip arthroscopy surgery using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate combination. Outcomes investigated were pre-op and post-op mean iHOT-12 scores up to 18 months after surgery with a Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis. Of 111 patients, 46 patients underwent MF and 65 biological reconstruction hip arthroscopy including cam/pincer osteoplasty and labral repair surgery. Age range was 20-69, mean age 45 years for both groups, Tonnis grading was as follows: Grade 0: 26% versus 30%, Grade 1: 52% versus 47% and Grade 2: 22% versus 23% in MF and biological reconstruction groups, respectively. The mean post-operative iHOT-12 score differences between MF and biological reconstruction were significant at 1-year minimum follow-up (

Identifiers

PMID33948205
PMCPMC8081409
OpenAlexW3158843563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.