ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2020
What can we learn from surveys? A systematic review of survey studies addressing femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementing video visits into an orthopedic hip arthroscopy practice: a case study.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the methodology, response rate and quality of survey studies related to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. A search was conducted on three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE) for relevant studies from database inception to 27 January 2020. Data extracted included study and survey characteristics, as well as response rates. The quality of the included studies was also assessed using a previously published quality assessment tool. Data were analysed with means, ranges, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals and bivariate analysis. Eleven studies (13 surveys) were included in this review out of a total of 1608 initial titles found. Surveys were most often administered via the Internet (72%) to orthopaedic surgeons (54%). The mean response rate was 70.4%. The mean quality score was moderate 13.3/24 (SD ±4.3). The criterion that most often scored high was 'clearly defined purpose and objectives' (11/11). The most common survey topic investigated surgeons' knowledge regarding FAI diagnosis and management (n = 7). In addition, bivariate analysis between quality score and response rate showed no significant correlation (Spearman's rho = -0.090,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.