Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948193›Full record

ReviewJournal of hip preservation surgery2020

Structured physical therapy protocols following hip arthroscopy and their effect on patient-reported outcomes-a systematic review of the literature.

Hari K Ankem, Mitchell J Yelton, Ajay C Lall, Alex M Bendersky, Philip J Rosinsky, David R Maldonado, Jacob Shapira, Mitchell B Meghpara, Benjamin G Domb

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Variability in Physical Therapy Protocols After Hip Arthroscopy.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hari K AnkemAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Mitchell J YeltonAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Ajay C LallAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Alex M BenderskyIvy Rehab Physical Therapy, Highland Park, IL 60035, USA.
Philip J RosinskyAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
David R MaldonadoAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Jacob ShapiraAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Mitchell B MeghparaAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.
Benjamin G DombAmerican Hip Institute Research Foundation, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-8647

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of structured physical therapy protocols on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following hip arthroscopy. A literature search was completed in October 2019 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify articles reporting specific rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy that document PROs. Studies meeting all inclusion and exclusion were reviewed and data were extracted. Six studies were included in analysis. The mean age was 34.7% and 56.6% were males. Five studies described rehabilitation protocols in phases with specific goals and progression criteria. All studies included range of motion (ROM) and weight-bearing (WB) precautions. Return to sport (RTS)/activity varied between 7 and 32 weeks. The studies used variations of 21 different PROs. Significant improvements in baseline and post-operative PROs noted across studies. Rehabilitation protocols following hip arthroscopy typically consist of 4-5 phase programs with set goals and progression criteria. Several commonalities existed between studies on WB, ROM precautions and gait normalization. However, timing and recommendations for RTS/return to work varied between studies and were dependent on the concomitant procedures performed as well as type of patient population. Clinically significant improvement in PROs from baseline noted in majority of the studies reviewed that involved a structured rehabilitation program following arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement. As there is heterogeneity in patient-specific characteristics across the included studies, no determination can be made as to which protocol is most effective and further high-quality comparative studies are needed. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Adopting phase-based rehabilitation protocols following arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement treatment help achieve improved outcomes that are predictable.

Identifiers

PMID33948193
PMCPMC8081410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.