ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2021
Assessment of satisfaction and associated factors of parturients underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia at the General Hospital, Ethiopia; 2019.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Satisfaction With Perioperative Services and Associated Factors in Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR perioperative medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Patient Satisfaction and Factors Associated With Anesthesia Services in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Perioperative patient satisfaction and its predictors following surgery and anesthesia services in North Shewa, Ethiopia. A multicenter prospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Comparison between 10 and 12 mg doses of intrathecal hyperbaric (0.5%) bupivacaine on sensory block level after first spinal failure in cesarean section: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimSpinal anesthesia for cesarean section is now a day a popular plan of anesthesia because of its rapid onset and high frequency of successful blockade. It is a vital monitor to the quality of care in anesthesia. The main aim of this study was to assess the level of maternal satisfaction and associated factors after cesarean section under spinal.
methodsHospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on mothers who underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Descriptive analysis and chi-square test were employed. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the association of factors with the level of satisfaction. A p-value of ≤0.25 and ≤ 0.05 was used to decide statistical significance for bivariable and multivariable logistic regression respectively.
findingsThe overall satisfaction level of parturients after spinal anesthesia was 97(80.2%). The satisfaction level was 83.3% with PONV treatment, 98.3% with intraoperative analgesia, between 52.5% and 64.2% to preoperative activities, and 72.5% for postoperative patient care by the anesthetist. Having previous anesthesia was the independent factor that has a significant association with the level of satisfaction with AOR, 3.94; 95%CI, 1.24-12.45; P- 0.01.
conclusionIn general, the overall satisfaction of the mothers towards spinal anesthesia was fair with a satisfaction score of 80.2%. Parturients were highly dissatisfied with the preoperative visit and information subscale as compared to the other subscales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.