Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948090›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2021

Opioid Policy and Chronic Pain Treatment Access Experiences: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Analysis and Conceptual Model.

Stephanie Slat, Avani Yaganti, Jennifer Thomas, Danielle Helminski, Michele Heisler, Amy Bohnert, Pooja Lagisetty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Pharmacists and opioid use disorder care during COVID-19: Call for action.Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie SlatDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8099-4954
Avani YagantiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jennifer ThomasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Danielle HelminskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michele HeislerDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Amy BohnertCenter for Clinical Management and Research, Ann Arbor VA Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Pooja LagisettyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

A Tailored Behavioral Intervention To Increase Engagement in Opioid Tapering in Primary Care SettingsK23DA047475 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAGISETTY, POOJA · 2019 to 2023
$970k
NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA047475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for pain have difficulty accessing primary care clinicians who are willing to prescribe opioids or provide multimodal pain treatment. Recent treatment guidelines and statewide policies aimed at reducing inappropriate prescribing may exacerbate these access issues, but further research is needed on this issue. This study aimed to understand barriers to primary care access and multimodal treatment for chronic pain from the perspective of multiple stakeholders.

methodsQualitative, semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with adult patients with chronic pain, primary care clinicians, and clinic office staff in Michigan. Interview questions covered stakeholder experiences with prescription opioids, opioid-related policies, and access to care for chronic pain. Interviews were coded using inductive and deductive methods for thematic analysis.

resultsA total of 25 interviews were conducted (15 patients, 7 primary care clinicians, and 3 office staff). Barriers to treatment access were attributed to six themes: (1) reduced clinic willingness to manage prescribed opioids for new patients; (2) lack of time and reimbursement for quality opioid-related care; (3) paucity of multimodal care and coordination between providers; (4) fear of liability and use of new guidelines to justify not prescribing opioids; (5) delayed prescription receipt due to prior authorization and pharmacy issues; and (6) poor availability of effective non-opioid treatments.

conclusionIssues of policy, logistics, and clinic-level resources converge to disrupt treatment access for patients with chronic pain, as many clinics both do not offer multimodal pain care and are unwilling to prescribe LTOT. The resulting conceptual model can inform the development of policy interventions to help mitigate these access barriers.

Indexed as

accesschronic painopioidpolicyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID33948090
PMCPMC8088411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.