Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33948054›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterology2021

Bowel preparation in diabetic patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Osama Qasim Agha, Muhammad Alsayid, Michael D Brown

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Osama Qasim AghaDivision of Internal Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona (Osama Qasim Agha).
Muhammad AlsayidDivision of Digestive Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (Muhammad Alsayid, Michael D. Brown), USA.
Michael D BrownDivision of Digestive Diseases, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois (Muhammad Alsayid, Michael D. Brown), USA.
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center · US

Funding

J. NRSA Training CoreTL1TR002388 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ALI KESHAVARZIAN, Sonia Kupfer · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
FITting noninvasive testing into Lynch syndrome colorectal cancer surveillance: a multicenter, prospective trialR01CA287257 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Fay Kastrinos, Sonia Kupfer · 2024 to 2026
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002388NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for poor bowel preparation in patients who undergo colonoscopy, because of their decreased intestinal transit and slow gastric emptying. This might lead to neoplastic or preneoplastic lesions being missed, longer procedural time, a higher risk of procedure-related adverse events, significant cost burden, patient dissatisfaction, and the need for a repeat colonoscopy. Multiple strategies have been suggested to improve bowel preparation in these patients. Proposed pharmacologic strategies include adding magnesium citrate, bisacodyl, lubiprostone or pyridostigmine. Non-pharmacologic strategies include preferential procedure scheduling or using a diabetes-specific preparation protocol. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the literature and provide specific recommendations to general practitioners and gastroenterologists for improving bowel preparation in patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

bowel preparationColonoscopycolorectal cancerdiabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33948054
PMCPMC8079869
OpenAlexW3133885772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.