ArticleNature methods2021
A global view of standards for open image data formats and repositories.
Article in Nature methods, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- A global effort toward standards for data sharing in biomedical imaging : Developing Consensus and Infrastructure for Global Data Interoperability.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- MIFA: Metadata, Incentives, Formats and Accessibility guidelines to improve the reuse of AI datasets for bioimage analysis.Nature methods · 2025Review
- Article
- Enabling global image data sharing in the life sciences.Nature methods · 2025Review
- SSBD: an ecosystem for enhanced sharing and reuse of bioimaging data.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Construction of medical scientific data repositories in China: analysis of survey and recommendations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Making the most of bioimaging data through interdisciplinary interactions.Journal of cell science · 2024Review
- AI analysis of super-resolution microscopy: Biological discovery in the absence of ground truth.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Review
- Morphomics via next-generation electron microscopy.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2024Review
- Toward a common standard for data and specimen provenance in life sciences.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- Big data in contemporary electron microscopy: challenges and opportunities in data transfer, compute and management.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Review
- Building a FAIR image data ecosystem for microscopy communities.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2023Review
- Spatial and temporal organization of the genome: Current state and future aims of the 4D nucleome project.Molecular cell · 2023Review
- Multisite assessment of reproducibility in high-content cell migration imaging data.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Tissue-Like 3D Standard and Protocols for Microscope Quality Management.Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada · 2023Article
- Interoperable slide microscopy viewer and annotation tool for imaging data science and computational pathology.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Emerging Computational Methods in Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Quality assessment in light microscopy for routine use through simple tools and robust metrics.The Journal of cell biology · 2022Article
- Standard metadata for 3D microscopy.Scientific data · 2022Article
- MITI minimum information guidelines for highly multiplexed tissue images.Nature methods · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33948027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.