Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947882›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Serial profiling of cell-free DNA and nucleosome histone modifications in cell cultures.

Vida Ungerer, Abel J Bronkhorst, Priscilla Van den Ackerveken, Marielle Herzog, Stefan Holdenrieder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. NINJ1: implications for plasma membrane rupture and disease.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vida Ungerer *Institute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Abel J Bronkhorst *Institute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Priscilla Van den AckervekenBelgian Volition SRL, 22 Rue Phocas Lejeune, Parc Scientifique Crealys, 5032, Isnes, Belgium.
Marielle HerzogBelgian Volition SRL, 22 Rue Phocas Lejeune, Parc Scientifique Crealys, 5032, Isnes, Belgium.
Stefan HoldenriederInstitute for Laboratory Medicine, German Heart Centre, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstraße 36, 80636, Munich, Germany. holdenrieder@dhm.mhn.de.
Deutsches Herzzentrum München · DEVolition (Belgium) · BETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in basic research have unveiled several strategies for improving the sensitivity and specificity of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) based assays, which is a prerequisite for broadening its clinical use. Included among these strategies is leveraging knowledge of both the biogenesis and physico-chemical properties of cfDNA towards the identification of better disease-defining features and optimization of methods. While good progress has been made on this front, much of cfDNA biology remains uncharted. Here, we correlated serial measurements of cfDNA size, concentration and nucleosome histone modifications with various cellular parameters, including cell growth rate, viability, apoptosis, necrosis, and cell cycle phase in three different cell lines. Collectively, the picture emerged that temporal changes in cfDNA levels are rather irregular and not the result of constitutive release from live cells. Instead, changes in cfDNA levels correlated with intermittent cell death events, wherein apoptosis contributed more to cfDNA release in non-cancer cells and necrosis more in cancer cells. Interestingly, the presence of a ~ 3 kbp cfDNA population, which is often deemed to originate from accidental cell lysis or active release, was found to originate from necrosis. High-resolution analysis of this cfDNA population revealed an underlying DNA laddering pattern consisting of several oligo-nucleosomes, identical to those generated by apoptosis. This suggests that necrosis may contribute significantly to the pool of mono-nucleosomal cfDNA fragments that are generally interrogated for cancer mutational profiling. Furthermore, since active steps are often taken to exclude longer oligo-nucleosomes from clinical biospecimens and subsequent assays this raises the question of whether important pathological information is lost.

Indexed as

ApoptosisCell Culture TechniquesCell CycleCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNAHistonesHumansMutationNecrosisNeoplasmsNucleosomesCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID33947882
PMCPMC8096822
OpenAlexW3159852075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.