Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947737›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Perceived facilitators and barriers to chronic disease management in primary care networks of Singapore: a qualitative study.

Chuan De Foo, Shilpa Surendran, Chen Hee Tam, Elaine Ho, David Bruce Matchar, Josip Car, Gerald Choon Huat Koh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Primary Care Networks and Starfield's 4Cs: A Case for Enhanced Chronic Disease Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chuan De FooHealth Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore ephfchu@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0001-7254-4881
Shilpa SurendranHealth Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore.
Chen Hee TamHealth Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore.
Elaine HoHealth Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore.
David Bruce MatcharInternal Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Josip CarCentre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8969-371X
Gerald Choon Huat KohHealth Systems and Behavioural Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe increasing chronic disease burden has placed tremendous strain on tertiary healthcare resources in most countries, necessitating a shift in chronic disease management from tertiary to primary care providers. The Primary Care Network (PCN) policy was promulgated as a model of care to organise private general practitioners (GPs) into groups to provide GPs with resources to anchor patients with chronic conditions with them in the community. As PCN is still in its embryonic stages, there is a void in research regarding its ability to empower GPs to manage patients with chronic conditions effectively. This qualitative study aims to explore the facilitators and barriers for the management of patients with chronic conditions by GPs enrolled in PCN.

designWe conducted 30 semistructured interviews with GPs enrolled in a PCN followed by a thematic analysis of audio transcripts until data saturation was achieved.

settingSingapore.

resultsOur results suggest that PCNs facilitated GPs to more effectively manage patients through (1) provision of ancillary services such as diabetic foot screening, diabetic retinal photography and nurse counselling to permit a 'one-stop-shop', (2) systematic monitoring of process and clinical outcome indicators through a chronic disease registry (CDR) to promote accountability for patients' health outcomes and (3) funding streams for PCNs to hire additional manpower to oversee operations and to reimburse GPs for extended consultations. Barriers include high administrative load in maintaining the CDR due to the lack of a smart electronic clinic management system and financial gradient faced by patients seeking services from private GPs which incur higher out-of-pocket expenses than public primary healthcare institutions.

conclusionPCNs demonstrate great promise in empowering enrolled GPs to manage patients with chronic conditions. However, barriers will need to be addressed to ensure the viability of PCNs in managing more patients in the face of an ageing population.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPrimary Health CareChronic DiseaseDisease ManagementHumansQualitative ResearchSingaporechange managementclinical governancehealth policyorganisation of health servicesprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID33947737
PMCPMC8098912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.