ArticleBMJ open2021
Performance of seven different paediatric early warning scores to predict critical care admission in febrile children presenting to the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic performance and clinical utility of a modified Brighton pediatric early warning score for 24-h ICU admission in a resource-limited pediatric emergency department.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Optimizing fever management in pediatric emergency medicine: pathophysiology, diagnostics, and evidence-based strategies.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Identification of distinct clinical profiles of sepsis risk in paediatric emergency department patients using Bayesian profile regression.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessing children who are acutely ill in general practice using the National PEWS and LqSOFA clinical scores: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Use of the Children's Observation and Severity Tool (COAST), an Adaptation of the Paediatric Early Warning Score, in the Emergency Department as a Predictor for Hospital Admission: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis: Integrating Early Warning Scores and Biomarkers for Improved Prognosis.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Utility of Carboxyhemoglobin Level for the Diagnosis of Invasive Bacterial Infection in a Febrile Neonate at Paediatric Emergency Department.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Response to: Comment on "Integrating Human Intuition into Prediction Algorithms for Improved Surgical Risk Stratification".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Comment on: "Integrating Human Intuition into Prediction Algorithms for Improved Surgical Risk Stratification".Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Predicting transfers to intensive care in children using CEWT and other early warning systems.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
- Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection.NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of parental and healthcare professional concern on the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis: a diagnostic accuracy study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Article
- Development and prospective validation of pediatric sepsis screening tool in a resource-limited setting.Turkish journal of emergency medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePaediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) are widely used in the UK, but the heterogeneity across tools and the limited data on their predictive performance represent obstacles to improving best practice. The standardisation of practice through the proposed National PEWS will rely on robust validation. Therefore, we compared the performance of the National PEWS with six other PEWS currently used in NHS hospitals, for their ability to predict critical care (CC) admission in febrile children attending the emergency department (ED).
designRetrospective single-centre cohort study.
settingTertiary hospital paediatric ED.
participantsA total of 11 449 eligible febrile ED attendances were identified from the electronic patient record over a 2-year period. Seven PEWS scores were calculated (Alder Hey, Bedside, Bristol, National, Newcastle and Scotland PEWS, and the Paediatric Observation Priority Score, using the worst observations recorded during their ED stay. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was CC admission within 48 hours, the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) >48 hours and sepsis-related mortality.
resultsOf 11 449 febrile children, 134 (1.2%) were admitted to CC within 48 hours of ED presentation, 606 (5.3%) had a hospital LOS >48 hours. 10 (0.09%) children died, 5 (0.04%) were sepsis-related. All seven PEWS demonstrated excellent discrimination for CC admission (range area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) 0.91-0.95) and sepsis-related mortality (range AUC 0.95-0.99), most demonstrated moderate discrimination for hospital LOS (range AUC 0.69-0.75). In CC admission threshold analyses, bedside PEWS (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.93) and National PEWS (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.93) were the most discriminative, both at a threshold of ≥6.
conclusionsOur results support the use of the proposed National PEWS in the paediatric ED for the recognition of suspected sepsis to improve outcomes, but further validation is required in other settings and presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.