Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947723›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Living labs for patient engagement and knowledge exchange: an exploratory sequential mixed methods study to develop a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation.

Mandy M Archibald, Kristy Wittmeier, Matthew Gale, Florencia Ricci, Kelly Russell, Roberta L Woodgate

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06455397 (Implementing BEAM), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06455397 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementing BEAM: An mHealth Tool to Prevent Mental Health Problems and Improve Developmental Outcomes in Young Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeslie E. RoosRan2024 to 2027Enrolled400ConditionsDepression, Anxiety, Anger, Parenting, Stress, PsychologicalArmsThe Building Emotional Awareness and Mental Health (BEAM) Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Era of Digital Healthcare: Emergence of the Smart Patient.Healthcare informatics research · 2025
    Article
  5. The Use of Arts-Based Methods to Enhance Patient Engagement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Living Lab Experience in Turin: Lifestyles and Exposure to Black Carbon.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mandy M ArchibaldCollege of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada mandy.archibald@umanitoba.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-1031
Kristy WittmeierPediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Matthew GaleRehabilitation Centre for Children, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Florencia RicciPediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Kelly RussellPediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Roberta L WoodgateCollege of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-2390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite recognition of the importance of patient engagement in research and knowledge translation, systematic approaches to engagement and co-ideation remain limited. Living labs are collaborative knowledge sharing systems that use multimethod, user-centred approaches that hold potential to catalyse these aims. However, their use in healthcare is limited, and no living lab has been developed in paediatric rehabilitation. In response to this gap and to propel innovative knowledge exchange, we propose a mixed methods study to co-develop a living lab prototype (ie, preliminary infrastructure with opportunity for scale up) in paediatric rehabilitation, with relevance to other healthcare contexts.

methodsAn exploratory sequential mixed methods study will be undertaken to determine research and knowledge exchange priorities and to inform the development of the living lab prototype. Stage 1: we will use a multipronged approach to sample 18-21 youth with developmental differences or rehabilitation needs, their youth siblings and parents/guardians from a provincial paediatric rehabilitation centre, to participate in qualitative and arts-based data collection. Data will provide insight into desirable features of the living lab. Stage 2: E-surveys to youth, siblings, parents/guardians and clinicians who receive or provide services at this same centre will expand on priorities and living lab features. Stage 3: integrated analysis will inform the living lab prototype development. ANALYSIS: Inductive thematic analysis using interpretive description, integrated analysis of visual data and descriptive and content analysis of e-survey data will be undertaken. Joint displays will facilitate data integration. Priorities will be identified using a modified rank-order method for each key living lab domain. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional ethics and site approval have been granted. A parent advisory group and rehabilitation engineering partners will confer on data and inform the development of the living lab prototype. User engagement with the prototype will occur during an online or in-person event, and findings shared through non-technical research summaries, journal articles and academic presentations.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesPatient ParticipationAdolescentChildHumansOrganizationsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, Biomedicaldevelopmental neurology & neurodisabilitypaediatricsqualitative researchrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID33947723
PMCPMC8098933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.