Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947581›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2021

Empathy and boundary turbulence in cancer communication.

Susan H McDaniel, Diane S Morse, Elizabeth A Edwardsen, Adam Taupin, Mary Gale Gurnsey, Jennifer J Griggs, Cleveland G Shields, Shmuel Reis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susan H McDanielDr. Laurie Sands Distinguished Professor of Families & Health, Departments of Psychiatry & Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: susanh2_mcdaniel@urmc.rochester.edu.
Diane S MorseAssociate Professor of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
Elizabeth A EdwardsenAssociate Professor of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
Adam TaupinEquilibria Psychological and Consultation Services, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary Gale GurnseyPrivate Practice, New York City, NY, USA.
Jennifer J GriggsProfessor of Internal Medicine, Hematology & Oncology Division, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cleveland G ShieldsProfessor of Marriage & Family Therapy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Shmuel ReisProfessor of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University/Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

NIMH INSTITUTIONAL NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARDT32MH018911 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI CAINE, ERIC D. · 1988 to 2012
$2.9M
Social and behavioral influences on clinical communication and pain managementR01CA155376 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI EPSTEIN, RONALD M., SHIELDS, CLEVELAND GEORGE · 2011 to 2015
$2.6M
Racial Differences in Physician-Patient Communication for Cancer Pain ManagementR21CA124913 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI SHIELDS, CLEVELAND GEORGE · 2007 to 2008
$315k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155376NCI NIH HHS R21 CA124913NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe and deepen our understanding of patient-centeredness, empathy, and boundary management in challenging conversations. Previous studies show frequent physician self-disclosure, while empathy and boundary management are infrequent.

methodsThree standardized patients (SPs) portrayed cancer patients consulting a new community-based physician, resulting in 39 audio-recorded SP visits to 19 family physicians and 20 medical oncologists. Transcripts underwent qualitative iterative thematic analysis, informed by grounded theory, followed by directed content analysis. We further defined the identified communicative categories with descriptive and correlational calculations.

resultsWe identified patient-centered physician response categories--empathy, affirmation, and acknowledgement; and physician-centered categories-transparency, self-disclosure, and projection. Acknowledgement and affirmation responses were frequent and empathy rare. Physician transparency and self-disclosure were common. Useful and not useful self-disclosures were highly correlated; empathy, useful and not useful transparency, and projection were moderately correlated. Most physicians used self-disclosure but few of these were judged patient-centered.

conclusionsPhysicians expressing empathy and patient-centered transparency were also more likely to use projection and physician-centered transparency, thus engaging in communication "boundary turbulence." Patients may benefit from physicians' improved use of empathy and boundary management.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansCommunicationEmpathyHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsCancerCommunicationEmpathyFamilyPatient centeredPhysiciansSelf-disclosure

Identifiers

PMID33947581
PMCPMC8517043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.