Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947478›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2021

Foraging conditions for breeding penguins improve with distance from colony and progression of the breeding season at the South Orkney Islands.

Jessica Ann Phillips, Annette L Fayet, Tim Guilford, Fabrizio Manco, Victoria Warwick-Evans, Phil Trathan

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica Ann PhillipsDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK. jessy.a.phillips@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1373-3791
Annette L FayetDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Tim GuilfordDepartment of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Fabrizio MancoAnglia Ruskin University, Cambridge Campus, East Rd, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK.
Victoria Warwick-EvansBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
Phil TrathanBritish Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK. pnt@bas.ac.uk.
British Antarctic Survey · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBAnglia Ruskin University · GBMansfield University · US

Funding

British Antarctic Survey UKRI/BAS Ecosystems Programme under ALI-ScienceCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Postgraduate Scholarships-Doctoral (PGS-D)Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Darwin Plus 072Rhodes Scholarships Ontario & Merton 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to central place foraging theory, animals will only increase the distance of their foraging trips if more distant prey patches offer better foraging opportunities. Thus, theory predicts that breeding seabirds in large colonies could create a zone of food depletion around the colony, known as "Ashmole's halo". However, seabirds' decisions to forage at a particular distance are likely also complicated by their breeding stage. After chicks hatch, parents must return frequently to feed their offspring, so may be less likely to visit distant foraging patches, even if their quality is higher. However, the interaction between prey availability, intra-specific competition, and breeding stage on the foraging decisions of seabirds is not well understood. The aim of this study was to address this question in chinstrap penguins Pygoscelis antarcticus breeding at a large colony. In particular, we aimed to investigate how breeding stage affects foraging strategy; whether birds foraging far from the colony visit higher quality patches than available locally; and whether there is evidence for intraspecific competition, indicated by prey depletions near the colony increasing over time, and longer foraging trips.

methodsWe used GPS and temperature-depth recorders to track the foraging movements of 221 chinstrap penguins from 4 sites at the South Orkney Islands during incubation and brood. We identified foraging dives and calculated the index of patch quality based on time allocation during the dive to assess the quality of the foraging patch.

resultsWe found that chinstrap penguin foraging distance varied between stages, and that trips became shorter as incubation progressed. Although patch quality was lower near the colony than at more distant foraging patches, patch quality near the colony improved over the breeding season.

conclusionsThese results suggest chinstrap penguin foraging strategies are influenced by both breeding stage and prey distribution, and the low patch quality near the colony may be due to a combination of depletion by intraspecific competition but compensated by natural variation in prey. Reduced trip durations towards the end of the incubation period may be due to an increase in food availability, as seabirds time their reproduction so that the period of maximum energy demand in late chick-rearing coincides with maximum resource availability in the environment. This may also explain why patch quality around the colony improved over the breeding season. Overall, our study sheds light on drivers of foraging decisions in colonial seabirds, an important question in foraging ecology.

Indexed as

Ashmole’s haloChinstrap penguinForagingGPSHabitat selectionIndex of patch qualityPrey availabilitySeabirdTDR

Identifiers

PMID33947478
PMCPMC8094539
OpenAlexW3159847976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.