Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947443›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2021

An exploratory pilot study of the effect of modified hygiene kits on handwashing with soap among internally displaced persons in Ethiopia.

Astrid Hasund Thorseth, Thomas Heath, Andualem Sisay, Mare Hamo, Sian White

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04078633 (Pilot Studies of Innovative Hand Washing Interventions for Internally Displaced Populations in Ethiopia), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04078633 nacompletednot on this map

Pilot Studies of Innovative Hand Washing Interventions for Internally Displaced Populations in Ethiopia

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2019 to 2020Enrolled400ConditionsBehaviorArmsHand hygiene interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Astrid Hasund ThorsethDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. astrid.thorseth@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8066-0233
Thomas HeathAction Contre la Faim, Paris, France.
Andualem SisayAction Against Hunger, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mare HamoAction Against Hunger, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Sian WhiteDepartment of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBAction Contre la Faim · FR

Funding

United States Agency for International Development (US) 720FDA18GR00255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInternally displaced persons fleeing their homes due to conflict and drought are particularly at risk of morbidity and mortality from diarrhoeal diseases. Regular handwashing with soap (HWWS) could substantially reduce the risk of these infections, but the behaviour is challenging to practice while living in resource-poor, informal settlements. To mitigate these challenges, humanitarian aid organisations distribute hygiene kits, including soap and handwashing infrastructure. Our study aimed to assess the effect of modified hygiene kits on handwashing behaviours among internally displaced persons in Moyale, Ethiopia.

methodsThe pilot study evaluated three interventions: providing liquid soap; scented soap bar; and the inclusion of a mirror in addition to the standard hygiene kit. The hygiene kits were distributed to four study arms. Three of the arms received one of the interventions in addition to the standard hygiene kit. Three to six weeks after distribution the change in behaviour and perceptions of the interventions were assessed through structured observations, surveys and focus group discussions.

resultsHWWS was rare at critical times for all study arms. In the liquid soap arm, HWWS was observed for only 20% of critical times. This result was not indicated significantly different from the control arm which had a prevalence of 17% (p-value = 0.348). In the mirror and scented soap bar intervention arms, HWWS prevalence was 11 and 10%, respectively. This was indicated to be significantly different from the control arm. Participants in the focus group discussions indicated that liquid soap, scented soap bar and the mirror made handwashing more desirable. In contrast, participants did not consider the soap bar normally distributed in hygiene kits as nice to use.

conclusionWe found no evidence of an increased prevalence of handwashing with soap following distribution of the three modified hygiene kits. However, our study indicates the value in better understanding hygiene product preferences as this may contribute to increased acceptability and use among crisis-affected populations. The challenges of doing research in a conflict-affected region had considerable implications on this study's design and implementation.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov 6 September 2019 (reg no: NCT04078633 ).

Indexed as

Behaviour changeConflictEthiopiaHandwashingHygiene kitInternally displaced personsSoap

Identifiers

PMID33947443
PMCPMC8097963
OpenAlexW3137110740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.