Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947413›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.

Sarah Raifman, Lauren Ralph, M Antonia Biggs, Daniel Grossman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toxicities of herbal abortifacients.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Self-Managed Abortion in the United States.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah RaifmanAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA. sarah.raifman@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-2412
Lauren RalphAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
M Antonia BiggsAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Daniel GrossmanAdvancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, 1330 Broadway Suite 1100, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of evidence indicates that some people seek options to terminate a pregnancy without medical assistance, but experiences doing so have largely been documented only among people accessing a clinic-based abortion. We aim to describe self-managed abortion (SMA) experiences of people recruited outside of clinics, including their motivations for SMA, pregnancy confirmation and decision-making processes, method choices, and clinical outcomes.

methodsIn 2017, we conducted 14 in-depth interviews with self-identified females of reproductive age who recently reported in an online survey administered to Ipsos' KnowledgePanel that, since 2000, they had attempted SMA while living in the United States. We asked participants about their reproductive histories, experiences seeking reproductive health care, and SMA experiences. We used an iterative process to develop codes and analyzed transcripts using thematic content analysis methods.

resultsMotivations and perceptions of effectiveness varied by whether participants had confirmed the pregnancy prior to SMA. Participants who confirmed their pregnancies chose SMA because it was convenient, accessible, and private. Those who did not test for pregnancy were motivated by a preference for autonomy and felt empowered by the ability to try something on their own before seeking facility-based care. Participants prioritized methods that were safe and available, though not always effective. Most used herbs or over-the-counter medications; none used self-sourced abortion medications, mifepristone and/or misoprostol. Five participants obtained facility-based abortions and one participant decided to continue the pregnancy after attempting SMA. The remaining eight reported being no longer pregnant after SMA. None of the participants sought care for  SMA complications; one participant saw a provider to confirm abortion completion.

conclusionsThere are many types of SMA experiences. In addition to those who pursue SMA as a last resort (after facing barriers to facility-based care) or as a first resort (because they prefer homeopathic remedies), our findings show that some individuals view SMA as a potential interim step worth trying after suspecting pregnancy and before accessing facility-based care. These people in particular would benefit from a medication abortion product available over the counter, online, or in the form of a missed-period pill.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousSelf-ManagementAbortion, InducedAdultFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMifepristoneMisoprostolMotivationPregnancyQualitative ResearchUnited StatesMifepristoneMisoprostolAbortionAbortion restrictionsBarriers to healthcareMissed-period pillQualitative researchSelf-managed abortion

Identifiers

PMID33947413
PMCPMC8093912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.