Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947369›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

The value of conventional radiographs for diagnosing internal fixation-associated infection.

Cheng Li, Nora Renz, Andrej Trampuz, Cristina Ojeda-Thies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cheng LiCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Mittelallee 3, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-8886
Nora RenzCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Mittelallee 3, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8011-6684
Andrej TrampuzCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Mittelallee 3, 13353, Berlin, Germany. andrej.trampuz@charite.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5219-2521
Cristina Ojeda-ThiesDepartment of Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avda Córdoba s/n, 28041, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-1491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the study is to  assess the diagnostic value of preoperative conventional radiographs for diagnosing infection associated with internal fixation devices.

methodsWe prospectively collected data of patients undergoing removal of internal fixation devices for any reason. Infection was diagnosed in case of purulence, sinus tract, positive histopathology and/or positive peri-implant tissue or sonication fluid culture. In radiographs radiolucent lines, implant breakage or displacement, or periosteal reaction were assessed. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were determined at admission.

resultsWe included 421 surgeries in 380 patients (median age 53.6 years, range 11-98 years), mainly indicated for infection (24.9%), nonunion (20.0%) and symptomatic implants (13.5%). Radiologic signs of infection included radiolucent lines (11.4%); implant breakage (12.4%) or displacement (10.7%); and periosteal reaction (7.1%). Infection was confirmed in 116 cases (27.6%). Only radiolucent lines (OR = 1.86 [95%CI: 1.00-3.38]) and periosteal reaction (OR = 2.48 [95%CI: 1.17-5.26]) were associated with infection, with a low sensitivity (16.4 and 12.1%, respectively), and high specificity (90.5 and 94.8%, respectively). Preoperative WBC and CRP had a sensitivity of 23.0 and 35.3%, and specificity of 91.7 and 89.5%, respectively.

conclusionsRadiological signs suggestive of infection were uncommon. Radiolucency and periosteal reaction were associated with infection, though with low sensitivity.

Indexed as

Prosthesis-Related InfectionsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildC-Reactive ProteinFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLeukocyte CountMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySonicationYoung AdultC-Reactive ProteinConventional radiographyDiagnostic imagingInternal fixationProsthesis-related infectionsRadiography

Identifiers

PMID33947369
PMCPMC8097790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.