Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947338›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2021

Healthcare professionals' experiences of being observed regarding hygiene routines: the Hawthorne effect in vascular surgery.

Francis Rezk, Margaretha Stenmarker, Stefan Acosta, Karoline Johansson, Malin Bengnér, Håkan Åstrand, Ann-Christine Andersson

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Characteristics of Hearing Aid Use in Adolescents Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francis RezkDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden. francis.rezk@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-6363
Margaretha StenmarkerUnit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.
Stefan AcostaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Karoline JohanssonUnit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.
Malin BengnérUnit of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden.
Håkan ÅstrandDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ann-Christine AnderssonJönköping Academy, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEJönköping University · SELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hawthorne Effect is the change in behaviour by subjects due to their awareness of being observed and is evident in both research and clinical settings as a result of various forms of observation. When the Hawthorne effect exists, it is short-lived, and likely leads to increased productivity, compliance, or adherence to standard protocols. This study is a qualitative component of an ongoing multicentre study, examining the role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy after vascular surgery (INVIPS Trial). Here we examine the factors that influence hygiene and the role of the Hawthorne effect on the adherence of healthcare professionals to standard hygiene precautions.

methodsThis is a qualitative interview study, investigating how healthcare professionals perceive the observation regarding hygiene routines and their compliance with them. Seven semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted, each interview included a different staff category and one individual interview with a nurse from the Department for Communicable Disease Control. Additionally, a structured questionnaire interview was performed with environmental services staff. The results were analysed based on the inductive qualitative content analysis approach.

resultsThe analysis revealed four themes and 12 subthemes. Communication and hindering hierarchy were found to be crucial. Healthcare professionals sought more personal and direct feedback. All participants believed that there were routines that should be adhered to but did not know where to find information on them. Staff in the operating theatre were most meticulous in adhering to standard hygiene precautions. The need to give observers a clear mandate and support their work was identified. The staff had different opinions concerning the patient's awareness of the importance of hygiene following surgery. The INVIPS Trial had mediated the Hawthorne effect.

conclusionThe results of this study indicate that the themes identified, encompassing communication, behaviour, rules and routines, and work environment, influence the adherence of healthcare professionals to standard precautions to a considerable extent of which many factors could be mediated by a Hawthorne effect. It is important that managers within the healthcare system put into place an improved and sustainable hygiene care to reduce the rate of surgical site infections after vascular surgery.

Indexed as

Effect Modifier, EpidemiologicHealth PersonnelVascular Surgical ProceduresGuideline AdherenceHumansHygieneInfection ControlAdherence to standard precautionsComplianceHawthorne effectHealthcare professionalsHierarchyHygiene observationVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID33947338
PMCPMC8097954
OpenAlexW3157183515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.