Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947323›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2021

A new method for exploring gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in GWAS with tree ensemble methods and SHAP values.

Pål V Johnsen, Signe Riemer-Sørensen, Andrew Thomas DeWan, Megan E Cahill, Mette Langaas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Bayesian neural networks for genomic prediction: uncertainty quantification and SNP interpretation with SHAP and GWAS.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gene-environment interactions in human health.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pål V JohnsenSINTEF DIGITAL, Forskningsveien 1, 0373, Oslo, Norway. pal.johnsen@sintef.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2599-7914
Signe Riemer-SørensenSINTEF DIGITAL, Forskningsveien 1, 0373, Oslo, Norway.
Andrew Thomas DeWanDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 1 Church Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Megan E CahillDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology and Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and Environmental Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, 1 Church Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Mette LangaasDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, A. Getz vei 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Norges Forskningsråd 272402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe identification of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in genome-wide association studies is challenging due to the unknown nature of the interactions and the overwhelmingly large number of possible combinations. Parametric regression models are suitable to look for prespecified interactions. Nonparametric models such as tree ensemble models, with the ability to detect any unspecified interaction, have previously been difficult to interpret. However, with the development of methods for model explainability, it is now possible to interpret tree ensemble models efficiently and with a strong theoretical basis.

resultsWe propose a tree ensemble- and SHAP-based method for identifying as well as interpreting potential gene-gene and gene-environment interactions on large-scale biobank data. A set of independent cross-validation runs are used to implicitly investigate the whole genome. We apply and evaluate the method using data from the UK Biobank with obesity as the phenotype. The results are in line with previous research on obesity as we identify top SNPs previously associated with obesity. We further demonstrate how to interpret and visualize interaction candidates.

conclusionsThe new method identifies interaction candidates otherwise not detected with parametric regression models. However, further research is needed to evaluate the uncertainties of these candidates. The method can be applied to large-scale biobanks with high-dimensional data.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyAlgorithmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTreesGene–gene and gene–environment interactionsGWASModel explainabilitySHAPTree ensemble modelsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID33947323
PMCPMC8097909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.