Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33947205›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2021

Establishing Thresholds for Minimal Clinically Important Differences for the Peripheral Artery Disease Questionnaire.

Poghni A Peri-Okonny, Jingyan Wang, Kensey L Gosch, Manesh R Patel, Mehdi H Shishehbor, David L Safley, J Dawn Abbott, Herbert D Aronow, Carlos Mena-Hurtado, Qurat-Ul-Ain Jelani and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01419080 (Patient-centered Outcomes Related to TReatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01419080 completednot on this map

Patient-centered Outcomes Related to TReatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories (PORTRAIT Registry)

TypeobservationalSponsorSaint Luke's Health SystemRan2013 to 2016Enrolled797ConditionsPeripheral Arterial Disease, Quality of Life, Quality of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Poghni A Peri-OkonnyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City (P.A.P.-O., D.A., M.B., J.A.S.).
Jingyan WangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.A.P.-O., J.W., J.G., D.S, Y.T., M.B., J.A.S.).
Kensey L Gosch
Manesh R PatelDivision of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (M.P.).
Mehdi H ShishehborHarrington Heart & Vascular Institute and Case Western University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (M.H.S.).
David L SafleyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City (P.A.P.-O., D.A., M.B., J.A.S.).
J Dawn AbbottDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.D.A., H.D.A.).
Herbert D AronowDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI (J.D.A., H.D.A.).
Carlos Mena-HurtadoVascular Medicine Outcomes (VAMOS) Program, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (C.M.-H., Q.-U.-A.J., K.G.S.).
Qurat-Ul-Ain JelaniVascular Medicine Outcomes (VAMOS) Program, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (C.M.-H., Q.-U.-A.J., K.G.S.).
Yuanyuan TangDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (P.A.P.-O., J.W., J.G., D.S, Y.T., M.B., J.A.S.).
Matthew BunteDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City (P.A.P.-O., D.A., M.B., J.A.S.).
Clementine LabroscianoDepartment of Medicine, Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (C.L., J.F.B.).
John F BeltrameDepartment of Medicine, Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia (C.L., J.F.B.).
John A SpertusDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City (P.A.P.-O., D.A., M.B., J.A.S.).
Kim G SmolderenVascular Medicine Outcomes (VAMOS) Program, Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT (C.M.-H., Q.-U.-A.J., K.G.S.).

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL110837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI JOHN A SPERTUS · 2012 to 2026
$5.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding minimum clinically important differences (MCID) in patient-reported outcomes is essential in interpreting the magnitude of changes in these measures. No MCID from patients' perspectives has ever been published for peripheral artery disease-specific health status assessment tools. The Peripheral Artery Questionnaire (PAQ) is a commonly used, validated peripheral artery disease-specific health status instrument for which we sought to prospectively establish its MCID from patients' perspectives. METHODS AND

resultsPatients presenting to vascular clinics with new or worsened claudication in the US cohort of the PORTRAIT (Patient-Centered Outcomes Related to Treatment Practices in Peripheral Arterial Disease: Investigating Trajectories) registry who completed baseline and follow-up PAQ assessments along with the Global Assessment of Functioning scale were included. Mean change in PAQ summary scores from 3- to 6-month follow-up was calculated according to Global Assessment of Functioning category. MCID was defined as the mean difference in scores between those with small improvement or deterioration and those with no change. Multivariable linear regression was used to provide an MCID estimate after adjusting for patients' 3-month PAQ score. Of the 483 patients who completed the Global Assessment of Functioning score at 6 months and who had available 3- and 6-month PAQ assessments, the mean age was 69 years, 42% were female, and 71% were White. The MCIDs for PAQ summary scale improvement and worsening were 8.7 (2.9-14.5) and -11.0 (-18.6 to -3.3), respectively. After multivariable adjustment, these were 8.9 (3.0-14.8) and -11.2 (-18.2 to -4.2), respectively. There was no significant interaction between treatment (invasive versus noninvasive) and Global Assessment of Functioning response (

conclusionsIn patients with new or worsened claudication, a 10-point change in PAQ summary score represents an MCID. This estimate needs external validation and may inform the interpretation of PAQ scores when used as outcomes in clinical trials or in routine clinical care. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01419080.

Indexed as

Peripheral Arterial DiseaseAgedFemaleHumansIntermittent ClaudicationMinimal Clinically Important DifferenceQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaireshealth statusminimal clinically important differencepatientsquality of liferegistries

Identifiers

PMID33947205
PMCPMC8254614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.