ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021
Genomic Tackling of Human Satellite DNA: Breaking Barriers through Time.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- H4K20me3 erasure facilitates reprogramming to totipotent-like state by promotingFundamental research · 2026Article
- Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- HELLS is required for maintaining proper DNA modification at human satellite repeats.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Comparisons between young, aged, and Alzheimer's brains reveal specific expression patterns for a subset of transposons and satellite repeats.Journal of biosciences · 2025Article
- Challenges in classifying human chromosomal heteromorphisms using banding cytogenetics: From controversial guidelines to the need for a universal scoring system.Human genome variation · 2024Review
- Antipsychotics Affect Satellite III (1q12) Copy Number Variations in the Cultured Human Skin Fibroblasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Overexpression of Pericentromeric HSAT2 DNA Increases Expression of EMT Markers in Human Epithelial Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Repetitive DNA Sequences in the Human Y Chromosome and Male Infertility.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Differential enrichment of H3K9me3 at annotated satellite DNA repeats in human cell lines and during fetal development in mouse.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
(Peri)centromeric repetitive sequences and, more specifically, satellite DNA (satDNA) sequences, constitute a major human genomic component. SatDNA sequences can vary on a large number of features, including nucleotide composition, complexity, and abundance. Several satDNA families have been identified and characterized in the human genome through time, albeit at different speeds. Human satDNA families present a high degree of sub-variability, leading to the definition of various subfamilies with different organization and clustered localization. Evolution of satDNA analysis has enabled the progressive characterization of satDNA features. Despite recent advances in the sequencing of centromeric arrays, comprehensive genomic studies to assess their variability are still required to provide accurate and proportional representation of satDNA (peri)centromeric/acrocentric short arm sequences. Approaches combining multiple techniques have been successfully applied and seem to be the path to follow for generating integrated knowledge in the promising field of human satDNA biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.