Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33946494›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Sensor Validation and Diagnostic Potential of Smartwatches in Movement Disorders.

Julian Varghese, Catharina Marie van Alen, Michael Fujarski, Georg Stefan Schlake, Julitta Sucker, Tobias Warnecke, Christine Thomas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julian VargheseInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Catharina Marie van AlenInstitute of Geophysics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Michael FujarskiInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Georg Stefan SchlakeInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Julitta SuckerInstitute of Medical Informatics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.
Tobias WarneckeDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-5900
Christine ThomasInstitute of Geophysics, University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7845-5385

Funding

Innovative Medical Research Fund (Innovative Medizinische Forschung), University of Münster I-VA111809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartwatches provide technology-based assessments in Parkinson's Disease (PD). It is necessary to evaluate their reliability and accuracy in order to include those devices in an assessment. We present unique results for sensor validation and disease classification via machine learning (ML). A comparison setup was designed with two different series of Apple smartwatches, one Nanometrics seismometer and a high-precision shaker to measure tremor-like amplitudes and frequencies. Clinical smartwatch measurements were acquired from a prospective study including 450 participants with PD, differential diagnoses (DD) and healthy participants. All participants wore two smartwatches throughout a 15-min examination. Symptoms and medical history were captured on the paired smartphone. The amplitude error of both smartwatches reaches up to 0.005 g, and for the measured frequencies, up to 0.01 Hz. A broad range of different ML classifiers were cross-validated. The most advanced task of distinguishing PD vs. DD was evaluated with 74.1% balanced accuracy, 86.5% precision and 90.5% recall by Multilayer Perceptrons. Deep-learning architectures significantly underperformed in all classification tasks. Smartwatches are capable of capturing subtle tremor signs with low noise. Amplitude and frequency differences between smartwatches and the seismometer were under the level of clinical significance. This study provided the largest PD sample size of two-hand smartwatch measurements and our preliminary ML-evaluation shows that such a system provides powerful means for diagnosis classification and new digital biomarkers, but it remains challenging for distinguishing similar disorders.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseTremorHumansProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSmartphoneartificial intelligencemovement disordersParkinson’s diseasesmartwatches

Identifiers

PMID33946494
PMCPMC8124167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.